Clinical outcomes of the Lotus Valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: An analysis from the RESPOND study.
Aged
Aortic Valve
/ abnormalities
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease
Europe
Female
Heart Valve Diseases
/ complications
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Hemodynamics
Humans
Latin America
Male
New Zealand
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Recovery of Function
Registries
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
aortic regurgitation
aortic valve stenosis
bicuspid
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
transfemoral
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
received:
22
03
2018
revised:
04
01
2019
accepted:
20
01
2019
pubmed:
19
2
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
19
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with bicuspid valves represent a challenging anatomical subgroup for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of the fully repositionable and retrievable Lotus Valve System in patients with bicuspid aortic valves enrolled in the RESPOND post-market registry. The prospective, open-label RESPOND study enrolled 1,014 patients at 41 centers in Europe, New Zealand, and Latin America, 31 (3.1%) of whom had bicuspid aortic valves. The mean age in the bicuspid patient cohort was 76.4 years, 64.5% were male, and the baseline STS score was 6.0 ± 10.2. Procedural success was 100%, with no cases of malpositioning, valve migration, embolization, or valve-in-valve. Repositioning was attempted in 10 cases (32.3%). There was one death (3.2%) and one stroke (3.2%) at 30-day follow-up. Mean AV gradient was reduced from 48.7 ± 17.0 mmHg at baseline to 11.8 ± 5.1 mmHg at hospital discharge (P < 0.001); mean effective orifice area (EOA) was increased from 0.6 ± 0.2 cm Data from the RESPOND registry demonstrate good clinical and echocardiographic outcomes up to 1 year postimplantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves using the repositionable Lotus Valve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30773838
doi: 10.1002/ccd.28120
pmc: PMC6593645
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1116-1123Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 30;64(13):1339-48
pubmed: 25257635
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):817-824
pubmed: 27101906
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2013 Feb;61(1):45-52
pubmed: 23381379
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 9;60(15):1438-54
pubmed: 23036636
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 1;109(11):1632-6
pubmed: 22459301
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 1;114(5):757-62
pubmed: 25037674
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:539-45
pubmed: 25466563
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr 25;9(8):825-827
pubmed: 27101907
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3359-3366
pubmed: 28651336
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):E88-98
pubmed: 25914355
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2330-9
pubmed: 25465419
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2789-800
pubmed: 20579534
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 30;69(21):2579-2589
pubmed: 28330793
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May;133(5):1226-33
pubmed: 17467434
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Feb 1;113(3):518-21
pubmed: 24342758
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):27-37
pubmed: 29297076
Heart. 2012 Aug;98(16):1229-36
pubmed: 22826560
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;86(1):144-51
pubmed: 25205469
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):1-9
pubmed: 25616813
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;89(3):768-72
pubmed: 20172124
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug;86(2):323-30
pubmed: 25594190
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):292-299
pubmed: 28535962
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1116-1123
pubmed: 30773838
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 11;70(2):252-289
pubmed: 28315732