Pemetrexed-loaded nanoparticles targeted to malignant pleural mesothelioma cells: an in vitro study.
Apoptosis
/ drug effects
Biopsy
CD146 Antigen
/ metabolism
Cell Cycle
/ drug effects
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Movement
/ drug effects
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Cell Survival
/ drug effects
Endocytosis
/ drug effects
Gold
/ chemistry
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Mesothelioma
/ drug therapy
Mesothelioma, Malignant
Metal Nanoparticles
/ chemistry
Pemetrexed
/ pharmacology
Pleural Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Reactive Oxygen Species
/ metabolism
gold nanoparticles
intrapleural delivery
mesothelioma
nanodrug delivery
pemetrexed
Journal
International journal of nanomedicine
ISSN: 1178-2013
Titre abrégé: Int J Nanomedicine
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101263847
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
19
2
2019
pubmed:
19
2
2019
medline:
19
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor characterized by poor prognosis. Its incidence is steadily increasing due to widespread asbestos exposure. There is still no effective therapy for MPM. Pemetrexed (Pe) is one of the few chemotherapeutic agents approved for advanced-stage disease, although the objective response to the drug is limited. The use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) as a drug delivery system promises several advantages, including specific targeting of malignant cells, with increased intracellular drug accumulation and reduced systemic toxicity, and, in the case of MPM, direct treatment administration into the pleural space. This study aims at exploring CD146 as a potential MPM cell-specific target for engineered Pe-loaded GNPs and to assess their effectiveness in inhibiting MPM cell line growth. MPM cell lines and primary cultures obtained by pleural effusions from MPM patients were assayed for CD146 expression by flow cytometry. Internalization by MPM cell lines of fluorescent dye-marked GNPs decorated with a monoclonal anti CD146 coated GNPs (GNP-HC) was proven by confocal microscopy. The effects of anti CD146 coated GNPs loaded with Pe (GNP-HCPe) on MPM cell lines were evaluated by cell cycle (flow cytometry), viability (MTT test), clonogenic capacity (soft agar assay), ROS production (electric paramagnetic resonance), motility (wound healing assay), and apoptosis (flow cytometry). GNP-HC were selectively uptaken by MPM cells within 1 hour. MPM cell lines were blocked in the S cell cycle phase in the presence of GNP-HCPe. Both cell viability and motility were significantly affected by nanoparticle treatment compared to Pe. Apoptotic rate and ROS production were significantly higher in the presence of nanoparticles. Clonogenic capacity was completely inhibited following nanoparticle internalization. GNP-HCPe treatment displays in vitro antineoplastic action and is more effective than Pe alone in inhibiting MPM cell line malignant phenotype. The innovative use of specifically targeted GNPs opens the perspective of local intrapleural administration to avoid normal cell toxicity and enhance chemotherapy efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30774332
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S186344
pii: ijn-14-773
pmc: PMC6361319
doi:
Substances chimiques
CD146 Antigen
0
Reactive Oxygen Species
0
Pemetrexed
04Q9AIZ7NO
Gold
7440-57-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
773-785Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 Jan;41(1):27-34
pubmed: 25467107
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015 Jan;10(1):9-23
pubmed: 24559038
Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Jan 1;123:8-18
pubmed: 27431778
Nanotoxicology. 2017 May;11(4):534-545
pubmed: 28415888
Oncogene. 2009 Aug 6;28(31):2796-805
pubmed: 19483725
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2013 Feb;17(1):99-103
pubmed: 22784439
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019 Jan 23;14:773-785
pubmed: 30774332
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Sep;3(9):1056-64
pubmed: 18758312
Chemotherapy. 2014;60(5-6):321-4
pubmed: 26279275
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58132
pubmed: 23516439
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017 Aug;26(8):933-944
pubmed: 28679291
Clin Ther. 2005 Sep;27(9):1343-82
pubmed: 16291410
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:70-74
pubmed: 28213004
Oncol Rep. 2015 May;33(5):2411-9
pubmed: 25738249
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:973927
pubmed: 22900129
J Control Release. 2015 Dec 28;220(Pt A):29-36
pubmed: 26476173
Eur Respir Rev. 2015 Mar;24(135):115-31
pubmed: 25726562
Pathobiology. 2016;83(1):33-40
pubmed: 26735863
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v31-9
pubmed: 26223247
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017 Nov 15;109:13-20
pubmed: 28709909
Semin Oncol. 2002 Feb;29(1):2-17
pubmed: 11836664
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 15;70(24):10299-309
pubmed: 21159649
J Pept Sci. 2011 Dec;17(12):805-11
pubmed: 22076954
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44
pubmed: 12860938
Cancer Cell. 2014 Apr 14;25(4):516-29
pubmed: 24684846
Mod Pathol. 2010 Nov;23(11):1458-66
pubmed: 20657552
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Jan;300(1):R32-9
pubmed: 20962205
Cell Res. 2015 May;25(5):533-4
pubmed: 25849249
J Control Release. 2018 Aug 28;284:160-170
pubmed: 29908222
Biomacromolecules. 2017 Oct 9;18(10):3318-3330
pubmed: 28886247
Histochem Cell Biol. 2004 Sep;122(3):249-60
pubmed: 15372243
Oncologist. 2005 Apr;10(4):282-91
pubmed: 15821248
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jul;14(7):825-36
pubmed: 27407123
Am J Clin Pathol. 2014 Jan;141(1):85-93
pubmed: 24343741
Acta Biomater. 2018 Apr 1;70:177-185
pubmed: 29410335
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 27;5:195
pubmed: 27026891
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov;1(4):508-15
pubmed: 23977545
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Aug 1;22(15):3791-800
pubmed: 26968202
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Mar;25(1):15-9
pubmed: 16761613