Management of Esophageal Achalasia after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Narrative Review of the Literature.
Dysphagia
Esophageal achalasia
Heller myotomy
POEM
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
20
2
2019
medline:
16
4
2020
entrez:
20
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The development of achalasia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is rare. Heller myotomy (HM) is the gold standard treatment while peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging technique with promising results. The aim of this narrative review was to summarize the current knowledge on the treatment of esophageal achalasia after RYGB. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted. All articles that described the management of achalasia after RYGB were included in this narrative review. Twelve studies for a total of 28 patients were included. The age of the patient population ranged from 44 to 70 years old and 80% were females. Overall, 61.5% underwent laparoscopic RYGB while 38.5% underwent open RYBG. The elapsed time from the RYGB to myotomy ranged from 14 months to 14 years. Dysphagia (64%) and regurgitation (60.7%) were the most commonly reported symptoms; type I achalasia was diagnosed in 50% of patients. Surgical HM was performed in 17 patients (61%) while POEM was performed in 11 patients (39%). Postoperative morbidity was 3.6% with no differences comparing surgical HM and POEM (6% vs. 0%, p = 0.43). The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 43 months. The overall recurrence rate requiring reoperation was 7% with no differences comparing surgical HM and POEM (12% vs. 0%; p = 0.25). Both HM and POEM seem feasible, safe, and effective in the management of achalasia after RYGB. The role of POEM in the management algorithm of these patients should be further evaluated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30778843
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03774-y
pii: 10.1007/s11695-019-03774-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1632-1637Références
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Jan;98(1):e3-5
pubmed: 26688418
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32
pubmed: 25835983
Endoscopy. 2019 Apr;51(4):342-345
pubmed: 30068002
Obes Surg. 1999 Aug;9(4):390-5
pubmed: 10484299
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):916-920
pubmed: 27606723
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct 7;23(37):6902-6906
pubmed: 29085233
Gut. 2016 May;65(5):732-9
pubmed: 26614104
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Nov;13(11):1927-1928
pubmed: 28935197
Innovations (Phila). 2016 May-Jun;11(3):214-6
pubmed: 27526345
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Feb;13(2):e1-e3
pubmed: 27916564
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):659-67
pubmed: 22982946
Can J Surg. 2014 Apr;57(2):139-44
pubmed: 24666452
Scand J Gastroenterol. 1981;16(6):721-5
pubmed: 7034160
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):172-177
pubmed: 30206785
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):1028-1035
pubmed: 29603141
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Sep 1;31(9):
pubmed: 30169645
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;13(2):111-9
pubmed: 26648126
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93
pubmed: 23871090
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Nov;12(9):1755-1757
pubmed: 27692913
Dig Dis Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;49(11-12):1818-21
pubmed: 15628710
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Sep;22(9):e256-61
pubmed: 20465592
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jul-Sep;11(3):203-4
pubmed: 26195880
Obes Surg. 2003 Dec;13(6):896-900
pubmed: 14738678
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4(4):396-8
pubmed: 23500742
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009 Jan-Feb;5(1):132-4
pubmed: 18722821
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 7;12(37):5921-5
pubmed: 17009388
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Jun;26(6):428-32
pubmed: 27035633
Endoscopy. 2014;46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E11-2
pubmed: 24446095