Adding a protective K-wire during opening high tibial osteotomy increases lateral hinge resistance to fracture.
High tibial valgus osteotomy
Hinge
Maximum load, cadaveric study
Patient-specific cutting guides
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2018
accepted:
06
02
2019
pubmed:
21
2
2019
medline:
4
9
2020
entrez:
21
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It was hypothesized in this in-vitro study that positioning a K-wire intersecting the cutting plane at the theoretical lateral hinge location would limit the cut depth and help preserve the lateral hinge during the opening of the osteotomy. Objectives were (1) to compare the mechanical resistance of the hinge and the protective effect of leaving the K-wire during the opening procedure (2) to check if the K-wire would limit the depth of the osteotomy. An ex-vivo mechanical study, testing 5 pairs of fresh-frozen tibias, was designed. CT-scan based Patient-specific cutting guides were obtained to define the cutting plane and the location of the K-wire at the hinge, using standardized 3D planning protocol. In each pair, OWHTO was performed either with or without the K-wire. To evaluate the hinge's resistance to fracture, the specimens were rigidly fixed at the proximal tibia and a direct load was applied on the free tibial diaphysis to open the osteotomy. The maximum load at breakage, maximum permissible displacement and maximal angulation of the osteotomy before hinge failure was measured. To assess the preservation of an unscathed hinge (protected by the K-wire), the distance from the end of the osteotomy cut to the lateral tibial cortical was measured in mm. The maximum load to hinge breakage in the K-wires PsCG knees compared to the control group (48.3 N vs 5.5 N, p = 0.004), the maximum permissible displacement (19.8 mm vs 7.5 mm, p = 0.005) and the maximal angulation of the osteotomy before hinge breakage (9.9° vs 2.9°, p = 0.002) were all statistically superior in the K-wires PsCG knees compared to the control group. A mean distance of 10 ± 1 mm between cut-bone (saw-print) and lateral hinge cortical bone was found post-performing the osteotomy and the hinge failing. The maximum load to breakage and the maximum permissible displacement were, respectively, 880% and 260% higher during the opening of the OWHTO in using K-wires compared to the non-K-wire control group. This confirms the mechanical advantage of using a K-wire for both stabilization and protecting the Hinge during OWHTO. This comparative cadaveric study shows an improvement of the lateral hinges resistance to failing during the opening of the osteotomy. This can be achieved by the placement of a K-wire intersecting the cutting plane at the theoretical location of the lateral hinge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30783689
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05404-7
pii: 10.1007/s00167-019-05404-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
751-758Références
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 18;17:216
pubmed: 27193431
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):245-250
pubmed: 28137553
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):832-837
pubmed: 26254088
Ochsner J. 2016 Winter;16(4):464-470
pubmed: 27999503
Arthroscopy. 2018 Nov;34(11):3073-3079
pubmed: 30292595
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018 Dec 1;30(4):303-310
pubmed: 29715716
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3433-3440
pubmed: 26869033
Bone Joint Res. 2018 Apr 12;7(2):166-172
pubmed: 29682282
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec;4(1):23
pubmed: 28646430
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):911-920
pubmed: 29546620
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:91-6
pubmed: 16906111
Lakartidningen. 1980 May 28;77(22):2091-3, 2096
pubmed: 7401762
Orthopade. 2014 May;43(5):425-31
pubmed: 24756354
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3704-3712
pubmed: 26154482
J Orthop Sci. 2015 Jan;20(1):129-36
pubmed: 25346318
Knee. 2016 Mar;23(2):295-9
pubmed: 26787119
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1851-1858
pubmed: 28389878
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3387-3395
pubmed: 27585448
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1032-1043
pubmed: 29229417
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Apr;42:48-54
pubmed: 28173978
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3246-3255
pubmed: 30396798
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004 Nov;19(9):944-50
pubmed: 15475127
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jan;24(1):101-9
pubmed: 18534407
Bone Joint J. 2017 Oct;99-B(10):1313-1318
pubmed: 28963152
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):85-94
pubmed: 21982387
Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Jan 04;5(1):e7-e10
pubmed: 27073780
Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1118-26
pubmed: 24634450