Macroinvertebrate Responses to Conductivity in Different Bioregions of Victoria, Australia.

Australia Electrical conductivity Field Salinity Species sensitivity distribution Water quality guidelines

Journal

Environmental toxicology and chemistry
ISSN: 1552-8618
Titre abrégé: Environ Toxicol Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8308958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 30 12 2017
revised: 30 01 2019
accepted: 15 02 2019
pubmed: 23 2 2019
medline: 17 4 2020
entrez: 22 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of field data to derive guideline water quality trigger values is likely to be more environmentally relevant than laboratory estimates. In the present study, macroinvertebrate responses to conductivity (specific conductance at 25 °C) within 5 bioregions in Victoria, Australia, were derived from 19 yr of macroinvertebrate field data. Varying response to electrical conductivity (EC) occurred among taxa. Ninety-five percent extirpation concentrations (XC95) for EC were calculated for each genus and species and ranged from 25 to 23 600 µS/cm. Hazardous concentration 5th percentiles (HC05) were calculated for each bioregion from species sensitivity distributions developed using genus and species XC95 values. Genus HC05 values varied substantially between bioregions: bioregion 1 (29 µS/cm), 2 (78 µS/cm), 3 (143 µS/cm), 4 (1068 µS/cm), and 5 (2226 µS/cm). No substantial differences in HC05 values were shown between genus- and species-level calculations in bioregions 1 to 3 and 5; however, a decrease of approximately 300 µS/cm was shown for bioregion 4. The substantial differences in HC05 values between bioregions supports the need for region-specific determination of effects of EC. We explore the use of HC05 values as water quality guidelines across a bioregion gradient and provide a comprehensive analysis of macroinvertebrate responses to changes in EC, with important implications for waterway management. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1334-1342. © 2019 SETAC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30790341
doi: 10.1002/etc.4400
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1334-1342

Informations de copyright

© 2019 SETAC.

Auteurs

Michael Shackleton (M)

Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Albury/Wodonga Campus, Victoria, Australia.

Aleicia Holland (A)

Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Albury/Wodonga Campus, Victoria, Australia.

Leigh Stitz (L)

School of Health, Medical and Applied Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia.

Paul McInerney (P)

Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Albury/Wodonga Campus, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH