Reflected hemodynamic waves influence the pattern of Doppler ultrasound waveforms along the umbilical arteries.
Doppler ultrasound
hemodynamics
umbilical artery
wave reflection
Journal
American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology
ISSN: 1522-1539
Titre abrégé: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100901228
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
23
2
2019
medline:
17
3
2020
entrez:
23
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pulsatile pattern of blood motion measured by Doppler ultrasound within the umbilical artery is known to contain useful diagnostic information and is widely used to monitor pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction or stillbirth. Animal studies have identified reflected pressure waves traveling counter to the direction of blood flow as an important factor in the shape of these waveforms. In the present study, we establish a method to measure reflected waves in the human umbilical artery and assess their influence on blood velocity pulsation. Ninety-five pregnant women were recruited from a general obstetrics clinic between 26 and 37 wk of gestation and examined by Doppler ultrasound. Blood velocity waveforms were recorded for each umbilical artery at three locations along the umbilical cord. With the use of a computational procedure, a pair of forward and reverse propagating waves was identified to explain the variation in observed Doppler ultrasound waveforms along the cord. Among the data sets that met data quality requirements, waveforms in 93 of the 130 arteries examined agreed with the wave reflection model to within 1.5% and showed reflections ranging in magnitude from 3 to 52% of the forward wave amplitude. Strong reflections were associated with large differences in pulsatility between the fetal and placental ends of the cord. As reflections arise from transitions in the biomechanical properties of blood vessels, these observations provide a plausible mechanism for the link between abnormal waveforms and clinically significant placental pathology and could lead to more precise screening methods for detecting pregnancies complicated by placental disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30794433
doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00704.2018
pmc: PMC6580395
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
H1105-H1112Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U01 HD087177
Pays : United States
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):499-503
pubmed: 10214822
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1999;213(3):195-202
pubmed: 10490292
Heart Vessels. 2000;15(1):49-51
pubmed: 11001487
Clin Cardiol. 2000 Nov;23(11):825-30
pubmed: 11097129
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Jan;80(1):1-6
pubmed: 11167180
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;17(6):466-76
pubmed: 11422966
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993 May 1;3(3):219-27
pubmed: 12797294
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Feb;30(2):147-54
pubmed: 14998666
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Oct;20(4):952-63
pubmed: 1527307
Circ Res. 1992 Apr;70(4):761-72
pubmed: 1551202
Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24):3722-8
pubmed: 16330686
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(8):922-8
pubmed: 16862469
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(5):409-13
pubmed: 16965229
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):288-300
pubmed: 21215383
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(5):449-58
pubmed: 2238251
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013 Jan;227(1):72-7
pubmed: 23516957
Placenta. 2014 Apr;35(4):275-80
pubmed: 24560495
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 15;122:281-7
pubmed: 26241682
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016 Jul;140(7):698-713
pubmed: 27223167
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 7;61(23):L48-L61
pubmed: 27811406
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017 May 1;312(5):H1021-H1029
pubmed: 28364018
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Dec;157(6):1443-8
pubmed: 2962497
Biol Sex Differ. 2018 Apr 18;9(1):16
pubmed: 29669590
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Mar 1;316(3):H664-H672
pubmed: 30632765
Am J Physiol. 1995 Nov;269(5 Pt 2):R1267-78
pubmed: 7503319
J Clin Ultrasound. 1993 Jun;21(5):317-24
pubmed: 8514899
J Clin Ultrasound. 1997 Oct;25(8):421-4
pubmed: 9321713
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jan;105(1):78-82
pubmed: 9442166