Anterolateral Thigh Flap in a Chicken Model: A Novel Perforator Training Model.


Journal

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
ISSN: 1098-8947
Titre abrégé: J Reconstr Microsurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502670

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 23 2 2019
medline: 31 1 2020
entrez: 23 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

 Preclinical training in perforator flap harvesting is typically conducted on living animal models; however, repeated training is not possible with these models because of ethical and/or economical constraints. We describe an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT flap) training model using chicken thigh that seems to be an appropriate training model prior, for example, to raise a perforator flap in a living rat or swine model.  A total of 10 chicken legs were used in this study. Six chicken legs were anatomically dissected to confirm the presence of the perforator and to identify the main vascular tree. In four chicken legs, a skin flap was planned based on the perforator and intramuscular dissection was performed under magnification.  The perforator was identified in all dissections and was consistently found 3 cm above the line extending from the patella to the head of the femur in its third proximal. Proximally, the mean diameter of the artery and vein was 0.56 (σ = 0.04) and 0.84 (σ = 0.06) mm, respectively. The mean dissection time to raise the flap was 88 (σ = 7) min.  This is the first description of a nonliving biological simulation model for training in perforator flap dissection that mimics an ALT flap. As an ex vivo chicken model, it is a cost effective and readily accessible model suitable for repeated practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
 Preclinical training in perforator flap harvesting is typically conducted on living animal models; however, repeated training is not possible with these models because of ethical and/or economical constraints. We describe an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT flap) training model using chicken thigh that seems to be an appropriate training model prior, for example, to raise a perforator flap in a living rat or swine model.
METHODS METHODS
 A total of 10 chicken legs were used in this study. Six chicken legs were anatomically dissected to confirm the presence of the perforator and to identify the main vascular tree. In four chicken legs, a skin flap was planned based on the perforator and intramuscular dissection was performed under magnification.
RESULTS RESULTS
 The perforator was identified in all dissections and was consistently found 3 cm above the line extending from the patella to the head of the femur in its third proximal. Proximally, the mean diameter of the artery and vein was 0.56 (σ = 0.04) and 0.84 (σ = 0.06) mm, respectively. The mean dissection time to raise the flap was 88 (σ = 7) min.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
 This is the first description of a nonliving biological simulation model for training in perforator flap dissection that mimics an ALT flap. As an ex vivo chicken model, it is a cost effective and readily accessible model suitable for repeated practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30795017
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679882
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

485-488

Informations de copyright

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None declared.

Auteurs

Alfio Luca Costa (AL)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Filippo Cucinotta (F)

Department of Engineering, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Antonina Fazio (A)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Gabriele Delia (G)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Mariarosaria Galeano (M)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Francesco Stagno d'Alcontres (F)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Bruno Battiston (B)

Department of Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.

Pierluigi Tos (P)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology for Hand, ASST Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.

Alexandru Georgescu (A)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rehabilitation Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Michele Rosario Colonna (MR)

Department of Human Pathology of the Adult, the Child and the Adolescent, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH