Actigraph assessment for measuring upper limb activity in unilateral cerebral palsy.
Actigraphy
Arm movements
Assisting hand assessment
Congenital hemiplegia
Information and communications technology (ICT)
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 02 2019
22 02 2019
Historique:
received:
13
09
2018
accepted:
11
02
2019
entrez:
24
2
2019
pubmed:
24
2
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Detecting differences in upper limb use in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is challenging and highly dependent on examiner experience. The recent introduction of technologies in the clinical environment, and in particular the use of wearable sensors, can provide quantitative measurement to overcome this issue. This study aims to evaluate ActiGraph GT3X+ as a tool for measuring asymmetry in the use of the two upper limbs (ULs) during the assessment with a standardized clinical tool, the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) in UCP patients aged 3-25 years compared to age-matched typically developing (TD) subjects. Fifty children with UCP and 50 TD subjects were assessed with AHA while wearing ActiGraphs GT3X+ on both wrists. The mean activity of each hand (dominant and non-dominant, MA The MA These results confirm that actigraphy could provide, in a standardized setting, a quantitative description of differences between upper limbs activity. ClincalTrials.gov, NCT03054441 . Registered 15 February 2017.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Detecting differences in upper limb use in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is challenging and highly dependent on examiner experience. The recent introduction of technologies in the clinical environment, and in particular the use of wearable sensors, can provide quantitative measurement to overcome this issue. This study aims to evaluate ActiGraph GT3X+ as a tool for measuring asymmetry in the use of the two upper limbs (ULs) during the assessment with a standardized clinical tool, the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) in UCP patients aged 3-25 years compared to age-matched typically developing (TD) subjects.
METHODS
Fifty children with UCP and 50 TD subjects were assessed with AHA while wearing ActiGraphs GT3X+ on both wrists. The mean activity of each hand (dominant and non-dominant, MA
RESULTS
The MA
CONCLUSIONS
These results confirm that actigraphy could provide, in a standardized setting, a quantitative description of differences between upper limbs activity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClincalTrials.gov, NCT03054441 . Registered 15 February 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30795810
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0499-7
pii: 10.1186/s12984-019-0499-7
pmc: PMC6387534
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03054441']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30Références
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):259-64
pubmed: 17376135
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Apr;86(2):539-50
pubmed: 9638752
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Jan;47(1):194-200
pubmed: 24824775
Sleep. 1998 Aug 1;21(5):472-6
pubmed: 9703586
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):326-33
pubmed: 16452744
Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 Sep-Oct;14(5):417-25
pubmed: 21180868
Physiol Meas. 2016 Sep 21;37(10):1798-1812
pubmed: 27653815
Neurology. 2004 Sep 28;63(6):1045-52
pubmed: 15452296
BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e017819
pubmed: 29764869
Neurosci Lett. 2002 Mar 1;320(1-2):102-4
pubmed: 11849774
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):886-91
pubmed: 19841839
J Mot Behav. 1987 Dec;19(4):486-517
pubmed: 15136274
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Jun;53(6):499-505
pubmed: 21418195
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(1):27-36
pubmed: 28339408
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Oct-Nov;31(10-11):965-976
pubmed: 29130382
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Apr;29(4):381-6
pubmed: 24670612
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;56(3):308-10
pubmed: 8459249
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):545-50
pubmed: 19109543
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;48(7):549-54
pubmed: 16780622
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Aug;11(6):1233-8
pubmed: 23799283
Neural Plast. 2018 Nov 14;2018:2831342
pubmed: 30538737
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180196
pubmed: 28671953
Phys Ther. 2016 Jan;96(1):37-45
pubmed: 26089043
J Child Neurol. 1995 Jul;10(4):300-9
pubmed: 7594266
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Mar;61(5):557-69
pubmed: 18034814
Clin Rehabil. 2010 Oct;24(10):887-900
pubmed: 20702511
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Nov;49(11):830-8
pubmed: 17979861
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):897-907
pubmed: 28715518
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012 May;16(3):257-65
pubmed: 21940183
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jun;101(3):226-32
pubmed: 8647035
Brain. 2003 Mar;126(Pt 3):732-47
pubmed: 12566293
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct;51 Suppl 4:16-23
pubmed: 19740206
Front Pediatr. 2017 Feb 13;5:21
pubmed: 28243583
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 6;15(1):94
pubmed: 30400992
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(2):226-234
pubmed: 29025283
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Nov;54(11):1037-43
pubmed: 22845645