Renal Safety of Intravenous Gadolinium-enhanced MRI in Patients Following Liver Transplantation.


Journal

Transplantation
ISSN: 1534-6080
Titre abrégé: Transplantation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0132144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 26 5 2020
entrez: 26 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intravenous contrast-enhanced imaging is invaluable in diagnosing pathology following liver transplantation. Given the potential risk of contrast nephropathy associated with iodinated computed tomography contrast, alternate contrast modalities need to be examined, especially in the setting of renal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the renal safety of MRI with gadolinium following liver transplantation. The study involved a retrospective analysis of 549 cases of abdominal MRI with low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine in liver transplant recipients at a single center. For each case, serum creatinine values before and after the MRI were compared. In addition, cases were analyzed for the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Pre-MRI creatinine values ranged from 0.32 to 6.57 mg/dL (median, 1.28 g/dL), with 191 cases having values ≥1.5 mg/dL (median, 1.86 g/dL). A comparison of the pre- and post-MRI creatinine values showed no significant difference, including those patients with pre-MRI values ≥1.5 mg/dL (mean change of -0.04 [95% confidence interval, -0.07 to -0.01; P = 0.004]). No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis were noted. Our findings suggest that, irrespective of baseline renal function, MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine is a nonnephrotoxic imaging modality in liver transplant recipients. Importantly, this intravenous contrast-enhanced imaging modality can be considered in those posttransplant patients who have a contraindication to computed tomography contrast due to renal insufficiency.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Intravenous contrast-enhanced imaging is invaluable in diagnosing pathology following liver transplantation. Given the potential risk of contrast nephropathy associated with iodinated computed tomography contrast, alternate contrast modalities need to be examined, especially in the setting of renal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the renal safety of MRI with gadolinium following liver transplantation.
METHODS
The study involved a retrospective analysis of 549 cases of abdominal MRI with low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine in liver transplant recipients at a single center. For each case, serum creatinine values before and after the MRI were compared. In addition, cases were analyzed for the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
RESULTS
Pre-MRI creatinine values ranged from 0.32 to 6.57 mg/dL (median, 1.28 g/dL), with 191 cases having values ≥1.5 mg/dL (median, 1.86 g/dL). A comparison of the pre- and post-MRI creatinine values showed no significant difference, including those patients with pre-MRI values ≥1.5 mg/dL (mean change of -0.04 [95% confidence interval, -0.07 to -0.01; P = 0.004]). No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis were noted.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that, irrespective of baseline renal function, MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine is a nonnephrotoxic imaging modality in liver transplant recipients. Importantly, this intravenous contrast-enhanced imaging modality can be considered in those posttransplant patients who have a contraindication to computed tomography contrast due to renal insufficiency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30801544
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002678
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Contrast Media 0
Organometallic Compounds 0
gadobenic acid 15G12L5X8K
Meglumine 6HG8UB2MUY
Creatinine AYI8EX34EU

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e159-e163

Auteurs

Mary M Flynn (MM)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Anjali N Parekh (AN)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Mehul R Parikh (MR)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Akhil Sood (A)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Katherine M Shaffer (KM)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Thomas M Runge (TM)

Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Anna M Lipowska (AM)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Sonali S Sakaria (SS)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Ram M Subramanian (RM)

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH