Validating Accelerometry as a Measure of Arm Movement for Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy.


Journal

Physical therapy
ISSN: 1538-6724
Titre abrégé: Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0022623

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2019
Historique:
received: 16 04 2018
accepted: 01 01 2019
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 4 12 2019
entrez: 26 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

For children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP), rehabilitation aims to increase movement of the affected arm. However, no validated measure objectively examines this construct in pediatric practice or daily life. The objective of this study was to evaluate the criterion and known-groups validity of accelerometry as a measure of arm movement in children and adolescents with HCP. This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven children and adolescents with typical development (3.4-13.9 years old) and 11 children and adolescents with HCP (4.7-14.7 years old; Manual Ability Classification System rating I or II) wore accelerometers on their wrists while engaged in 20 minutes of play, which included intermittent intervals of stillness and vigorous movement of the arms. Vector magnitude (VM) values identified the presence (VM > 2.0 counts per epoch) and absence (VM ≤ 2.0 counts per epoch) of arm movement for every 2-second epoch. Video was simultaneously recorded; each 2-second interval of footage was scored as "movement" or "no movement" for each arm. Agreement between accelerometry and video observation was greater than or equal to 81%, and the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ value was greater than or equal to 0.69 for both groups of participants; these results supported the criterion validity of accelerometry. The ratio of nondominant arm movement to dominant arm movement measured by accelerometry was significantly greater in participants with typical development (mean [SD] = 0.87 [0.09]) than in participants with HCP (mean = 0.78 [0.07]) on the basis of 10 age- and sex-matched pairs; these results supported known-groups validity. The small sample size of the group with HCP prevented the stratification of data by age. Participants with HCP had high or moderately high function of the affected arm; hence, the findings do not apply to children and adolescents with more significant hemiparesis. Accelerometry is a valid measure of arm movement in children with HCP and children without HCP. These findings contribute to the development of innovative upper limb assessments for children with hemiparesis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
For children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP), rehabilitation aims to increase movement of the affected arm. However, no validated measure objectively examines this construct in pediatric practice or daily life.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the criterion and known-groups validity of accelerometry as a measure of arm movement in children and adolescents with HCP.
DESIGN
This was a prospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS
Twenty-seven children and adolescents with typical development (3.4-13.9 years old) and 11 children and adolescents with HCP (4.7-14.7 years old; Manual Ability Classification System rating I or II) wore accelerometers on their wrists while engaged in 20 minutes of play, which included intermittent intervals of stillness and vigorous movement of the arms. Vector magnitude (VM) values identified the presence (VM > 2.0 counts per epoch) and absence (VM ≤ 2.0 counts per epoch) of arm movement for every 2-second epoch. Video was simultaneously recorded; each 2-second interval of footage was scored as "movement" or "no movement" for each arm.
RESULTS
Agreement between accelerometry and video observation was greater than or equal to 81%, and the prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ value was greater than or equal to 0.69 for both groups of participants; these results supported the criterion validity of accelerometry. The ratio of nondominant arm movement to dominant arm movement measured by accelerometry was significantly greater in participants with typical development (mean [SD] = 0.87 [0.09]) than in participants with HCP (mean = 0.78 [0.07]) on the basis of 10 age- and sex-matched pairs; these results supported known-groups validity.
LIMITATIONS
The small sample size of the group with HCP prevented the stratification of data by age. Participants with HCP had high or moderately high function of the affected arm; hence, the findings do not apply to children and adolescents with more significant hemiparesis.
CONCLUSIONS
Accelerometry is a valid measure of arm movement in children with HCP and children without HCP. These findings contribute to the development of innovative upper limb assessments for children with hemiparesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30801644
pii: 5364547
doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz022
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

721-729

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Physical Therapy Association.

Auteurs

Jaclyn Dawe (J)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto; and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Jaynie F Yang (JF)

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine; and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Darcy Fehlings (D)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto; Bloorview Research Institute, Toronto; and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

Jirapat Likitlersuang (J)

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network; and Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto.

Peter Rumney (P)

Bloorview Research Institute; and Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

José Zariffa (J)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network; and Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto.

Kristin E Musselman (KE)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto; SCI Mobility Lab, Lyndhurst Centre, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-UHN, 520 Sutherland Dr, Toronto, ON, M4G 3V9, Canada; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network; and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH