Surgically Relevant Morphological Parameters of Proximal Human Femur: A Statistical Analysis Based on 3D Reconstruction of CT Data.
Femur morphology
Hip joint
Impingement
Morphological study
Proximal femur
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2018
revised:
07
11
2018
accepted:
13
12
2018
pubmed:
28
2
2019
medline:
18
6
2019
entrez:
28
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, more accurate description of the femoral geometry has become of interest to engineers and orthopedic surgeons. However, an appropriate database is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study is to present morphological parameters and their correlations, which are relevant for medical issues such as impingement after total hip replacement, as well as for implant design and the etiology of hip fractures. We investigated 12 well-known morphological parameters of the femur in 169 healthy human subjects through evaluation of 3D-reconstructed CT scans. Pearson's coefficients of correlations were calculated using a statistical t-test method for each pair of parameters. The mean, maximum, minimum, median, and standard deviation values are reported for all parameters. Histograms showing the distribution of each morphological parameter are also presented. It is shown that absolute and horizontal offsets, total femur length, and NCVD parameters are normally distributed, but NCDF and NCDS are not. Furthermore, an inter-correlation matrix was reported to reveal statistical correlations between these parameters. The strongest positive correlation existed between absolute offset (OSA) and horizontal offset (OSH), while the least positive correlation was found between NCDF and total femur length (TFL), and also between NCDS and NCDF. Anteversion angle (ATA) and OSA showed the least negative correlation. However, the strongest negative correlation was found between neck-shaft angle (NSA) and greater trochanter height (GTH), as well as between OSA and NCVD. Comprehending patients' native bone morphology, including the variations and correlations, is essential for orthopedic surgeons to undertake preoperative planning and surgery as well as to appropriately design medical devices. Thus, more population-based detailed databases are necessary. We investigated an extensive set of proximal femoral morphology parameters using a statistically standardized method to expand the existing knowledge. The results of our study can be used for diverse medical and biomechanical purposes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30809957
doi: 10.1111/os.12416
pmc: PMC6430457
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
135-142Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Dec;81(12):1747-70
pubmed: 10608388
Acta Orthop Belg. 2006 Jan;72(1):51-4
pubmed: 16570895
Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):465-71
pubmed: 16901743
Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:131-44
pubmed: 16958446
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):28-32
pubmed: 1732260
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1832-42
pubmed: 17671025
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948 Jul;30A(3):745-51
pubmed: 18109784
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):909-16
pubmed: 18781367
Med Eng Phys. 2008 Dec;30(10):1275-86
pubmed: 18976949
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Jul;95(1):23-30
pubmed: 19231021
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):333-40
pubmed: 19258608
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Apr;91(4):545-51
pubmed: 19336820
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9
pubmed: 19423418
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Jun;96(4):367-75
pubmed: 20471935
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jan;19(1):17-26
pubmed: 21205764
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:99-106
pubmed: 21543698
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e467-73
pubmed: 22096224
Clin Orthop Surg. 2012 Sep;4(3):209-15
pubmed: 22949952
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Apr;28(4):650-3
pubmed: 23140992
Clin Anat. 2014 May;27(4):659-68
pubmed: 23960000
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:692328
pubmed: 25025068
Surg Radiol Anat. 2015 May;37(4):377-84
pubmed: 25193326
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 May;43(5):1247-59
pubmed: 25366904
Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1586-93
pubmed: 25452359
Eurasian J Med. 2011 Aug;43(2):73-8
pubmed: 25610167
Bone Joint Res. 2015 Feb;4(2):17-22
pubmed: 25673625
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016 Jan;31:87-92
pubmed: 26432415
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 16;46(1):69-74
pubmed: 27026989
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1317-1323
pubmed: 27484875
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Mar 2;17(1):29
pubmed: 29495963
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Aug;13(8):1151-1158
pubmed: 29785589