Trends in the Incidence, Treatment and Outcomes of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: Facility Type is Associated with Margin Status, Use of Lymphadenectomy and Overall Survival.
Academic Medical Centers
/ statistics & numerical data
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bile Duct Neoplasms
/ epidemiology
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic
/ surgery
Cancer Care Facilities
/ statistics & numerical data
Cholangiocarcinoma
/ epidemiology
Databases, Factual
Female
Health Facilities
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Community
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Incidence
Lymph Node Excision
/ trends
Lymph Nodes
/ pathology
Male
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm, Residual
Survival Rate
/ trends
Treatment Outcome
United States
/ epidemiology
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
2
3
2019
medline:
19
11
2019
entrez:
2
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains an uncommon disease with a rising incidence worldwide. We sought to identify trends in therapeutic approaches and differences in patient outcomes based on facility types. Between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015, a total of 27,120 patients with histologic diagnosis of ICC were identified in the National Cancer Database and were enrolled in this study. The incidence of ICC patients increased from 1194 in 2004 to 3821 in 2015 with an average annual increase of 4.16% (p < 0.001). Median survival of the cohort improved over the last 6 years of the study period (2004-2009: 8.05 months vs. 2010-2015: 9.49 months; p < 0.001). Among surgical patients (n = 5943, 21.9%), the incidence of R0 resection, lymphadenectomy and harvest of ≥6 lymph nodes increased over time (p < 0.001). Positive surgical margins (referent R0: R1, HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79, p < 0.001) and treatment at community cancer centers (referent academic centers; HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49, p = 0.023) were associated with a worse prognosis. Patients treated at academic centers had higher rates of R0 resection (72.4% vs. 67.7%; p = 0.006) and lymphadenectomy (55.6% vs. 49.5%, p = 0.009) versus community cancer centers. Overall survival was also better at academic versus community cancer programs (median OS: 11 months versus 6 months, respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of ICC has increased over the last 12 years in the USA with a moderate improvement in survival over time. Treatment at academic cancer centers was associated with higher R0 resection and lymphadenectomy rates, as well as improved OS for patients with ICC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30820734
doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04966-4
pii: 10.1007/s00268-019-04966-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1777-1787Références
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Aug;7(4):270-276
pubmed: 30221154
J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;110(2):163-70
pubmed: 24676600
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):107-14
pubmed: 20531002
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):362-372
pubmed: 27923615
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):52-59
pubmed: 28424987
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Dec;17(12):2114-22
pubmed: 24072683
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):842-51
pubmed: 18266046
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1722-1728
pubmed: 28241198
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Mar;21(3):379-386
pubmed: 30266490
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Dec;19(12):1046-1057
pubmed: 28967535
Cancer. 2015 Nov 15;121(22):3998-4006
pubmed: 26264223
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81
pubmed: 20375404
Oncol Rep. 2013 Apr;29(4):1259-67
pubmed: 23426976
Surgery. 2018 May;163(5):1114-1120
pubmed: 29398035
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;116(6):643-650
pubmed: 28608424
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Nov;17(11):1917-28
pubmed: 24048613
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Apr;22(4):668-675
pubmed: 29264768
World J Surg. 2016 Sep;40(9):2229-36
pubmed: 27255940
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Apr;7(4):423-7
pubmed: 19406042
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1999-2010
pubmed: 26194257
Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):594-9
pubmed: 27000463
Br J Surg. 2018 Jun;105(7):857-866
pubmed: 29656380