Adjunctive gentamicin did not improve outcome of enterococcal bacteraemia in neutropenic patients: a propensity scored matched study.


Journal

Infectious diseases (London, England)
ISSN: 2374-4243
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101650235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 2 3 2019
medline: 21 12 2019
entrez: 2 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with haematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy have a high risk of developing febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infections. The benefit of adjunctive gentamicin treatment for enterococcal bloodstream infections is debated. In this study, we compare the treatment outcome of a cell wall-active antibiotic with and without gentamicin for enterococcal bacteraemia in patients with neutropenia. The observational study was performed from 1999 through 2016. Patients with bacteraemia due to non-high level gentamicin-resistant enterococci were included. Analyses were performed in two data sets of episodes with enterococcal bacteraemia. One data set consisting of all included episodes (full cohort, n = 154) and one with propensity score-matched episodes (n = 96). The primary endpoint was death within 30 days, and the secondary outcomes were defervescence and persistence of enterococcal bloodstream infection after initiation of anti-enterococcal therapy. Episodes with gentamicin treatment (n = 82, full cohort; n = 48, propensity score-matched cohort) were comparable with episodes without gentamicin treatment (n = 72, full cohort; n = 48, propensity score-matched cohort) with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. Enterococcus faecium (40.9%) was the most frequently isolated organism. In the propensity score-matched cohort, there was no difference in 30-days mortality (14.6% in episodes with gentamicin versus 16.7% in episodes without gentamicin, p = 1), median time to defervescence (1 versus 2 days, p = .37) or persistence of enterococcal bloodstream infection for ≥72 h (9.4% versus 7.5%, p = 1). In our study with neutropenic patients, treatment with a cell wall-active antibiotic without adjunctive gentamicin for episodes with enterococcal bloodstream infection was as effective as combination therapy with gentamicin.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with haematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy have a high risk of developing febrile neutropenia and bloodstream infections. The benefit of adjunctive gentamicin treatment for enterococcal bloodstream infections is debated. In this study, we compare the treatment outcome of a cell wall-active antibiotic with and without gentamicin for enterococcal bacteraemia in patients with neutropenia.
METHODS
The observational study was performed from 1999 through 2016. Patients with bacteraemia due to non-high level gentamicin-resistant enterococci were included. Analyses were performed in two data sets of episodes with enterococcal bacteraemia. One data set consisting of all included episodes (full cohort, n = 154) and one with propensity score-matched episodes (n = 96). The primary endpoint was death within 30 days, and the secondary outcomes were defervescence and persistence of enterococcal bloodstream infection after initiation of anti-enterococcal therapy.
RESULTS
Episodes with gentamicin treatment (n = 82, full cohort; n = 48, propensity score-matched cohort) were comparable with episodes without gentamicin treatment (n = 72, full cohort; n = 48, propensity score-matched cohort) with regard to patient- and disease-related characteristics. Enterococcus faecium (40.9%) was the most frequently isolated organism. In the propensity score-matched cohort, there was no difference in 30-days mortality (14.6% in episodes with gentamicin versus 16.7% in episodes without gentamicin, p = 1), median time to defervescence (1 versus 2 days, p = .37) or persistence of enterococcal bloodstream infection for ≥72 h (9.4% versus 7.5%, p = 1).
CONCLUSIONS
In our study with neutropenic patients, treatment with a cell wall-active antibiotic without adjunctive gentamicin for episodes with enterococcal bloodstream infection was as effective as combination therapy with gentamicin.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30821562
doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1581946
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Gentamicins 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

409-416

Auteurs

Philipp Jent (P)

a Department of Infectious Diseases , Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

Laura Thalmann (L)

b Medical School, Faculty of Medicine , University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

Thomas Pabst (T)

c Department of Medical Oncology , Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

Sara Droz (S)

d Institute of Infectious Diseases , University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

Parham Sendi (P)

a Department of Infectious Diseases , Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.
d Institute of Infectious Diseases , University of Bern , Bern , Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH