Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Austria
Biomarkers
/ blood
Clinical Decision-Making
Germany
Humans
Immunoglobulin A
/ administration & dosage
Immunoglobulin G
/ administration & dosage
Immunoglobulin M
/ administration & dosage
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
/ administration & dosage
Immunotherapy
/ adverse effects
Infusions, Intravenous
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Patient Selection
Peritonitis
/ diagnosis
Precision Medicine
/ adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sepsis
/ diagnosis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Biomarkers
IgGAM
Pentaglobin
Peritonitis
Personalized medicine
Sepsis
Severe bacterial infection
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2019
04 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
20
03
2018
accepted:
08
02
2019
entrez:
6
3
2019
pubmed:
6
3
2019
medline:
27
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Peritonitis is responsible for thousands of deaths annually in Germany alone. Even source control (SC) and antibiotic treatment often fail to prevent severe sepsis or septic shock, and this situation has hardly improved in the past two decades. Most experimental immunomodulatory therapeutics for sepsis have been aimed at blocking or dampening a specific pro-inflammatory immunological mediator. However, the patient collective is large and heterogeneous. There are therefore grounds for investigating the possibility of developing personalized therapies by classifying patients into groups according to biomarkers. This study aims to combine an assessment of the efficacy of treatment with a preparation of human immunoglobulins G, A, and M (IgGAM) with individual status of various biomarkers (immunoglobulin level, procalcitonin, interleukin 6, antigen D-related human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR), transcription factor NF-κB1, adrenomedullin, and pathogen spectrum). A total of 200 patients with sepsis or septic shock will receive standard-of-care treatment (SoC). Of these, 133 patients (selected by 1:2 randomization) will in addition receive infusions of IgGAM for 5 days. All patients will be followed for approximately 90 days and assessed by the multiple-organ failure (MOF) score, by the EQ QLQ 5D quality-of-life scale, and by measurement of vital signs, biomarkers (as above), and survival. This study is intended to provide further information on the efficacy and safety of treatment with IgGAM and to offer the possibility of correlating these with the biomarkers to be studied. Specifically, it will test (at a descriptive level) the hypothesis that patients receiving IgGAM who have higher inflammation status (IL-6) and poorer immune status (low HLA-DR, low immunoglobulin levels) have a better outcome than patients who do not receive IgGAM. It is expected to provide information that will help to close the knowledge gap concerning the association between the effect of IgGAM and the presence of various biomarkers, thus possibly opening the way to a personalized medicine. EudraCT, 2016-001788-34; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03334006 . Registered on 17 Nov 2017. Trial sponsor: RWTH Aachen University, represented by the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (contact Dr. S. Isfort).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Peritonitis is responsible for thousands of deaths annually in Germany alone. Even source control (SC) and antibiotic treatment often fail to prevent severe sepsis or septic shock, and this situation has hardly improved in the past two decades. Most experimental immunomodulatory therapeutics for sepsis have been aimed at blocking or dampening a specific pro-inflammatory immunological mediator. However, the patient collective is large and heterogeneous. There are therefore grounds for investigating the possibility of developing personalized therapies by classifying patients into groups according to biomarkers. This study aims to combine an assessment of the efficacy of treatment with a preparation of human immunoglobulins G, A, and M (IgGAM) with individual status of various biomarkers (immunoglobulin level, procalcitonin, interleukin 6, antigen D-related human leucocyte antigen (HLA-DR), transcription factor NF-κB1, adrenomedullin, and pathogen spectrum).
METHODS/DESIGN
METHODS
A total of 200 patients with sepsis or septic shock will receive standard-of-care treatment (SoC). Of these, 133 patients (selected by 1:2 randomization) will in addition receive infusions of IgGAM for 5 days. All patients will be followed for approximately 90 days and assessed by the multiple-organ failure (MOF) score, by the EQ QLQ 5D quality-of-life scale, and by measurement of vital signs, biomarkers (as above), and survival.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study is intended to provide further information on the efficacy and safety of treatment with IgGAM and to offer the possibility of correlating these with the biomarkers to be studied. Specifically, it will test (at a descriptive level) the hypothesis that patients receiving IgGAM who have higher inflammation status (IL-6) and poorer immune status (low HLA-DR, low immunoglobulin levels) have a better outcome than patients who do not receive IgGAM. It is expected to provide information that will help to close the knowledge gap concerning the association between the effect of IgGAM and the presence of various biomarkers, thus possibly opening the way to a personalized medicine.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
EudraCT, 2016-001788-34; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03334006 . Registered on 17 Nov 2017. Trial sponsor: RWTH Aachen University, represented by the Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen (contact Dr. S. Isfort).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30832742
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4
pmc: PMC6399861
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Biomarkers
0
Immunoglobulin A
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03334006']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
156Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;160(1):132-6
pubmed: 10390390
Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;28(4):977-83
pubmed: 10809269
Physiol Res. 2000;49 Suppl 1:S57-61
pubmed: 10984072
J Surg Res. 2001 Feb;95(2):207-18
pubmed: 11162047
N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 8;344(10):699-709
pubmed: 11236773
Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;29(4):765-9
pubmed: 11373466
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 1;164(3):396-402
pubmed: 11500339
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002 Apr;387(1):14-20
pubmed: 11981679
Crit Care Med. 2003 May;31(5):1560-7
pubmed: 12771633
Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2173-82
pubmed: 15640628
Shock. 2005 Apr;23(4):298-304
pubmed: 15803051
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):102-7
pubmed: 16374163
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 1;174(1):84-93
pubmed: 16603606
Shock. 2007 Oct;28(4):418-25
pubmed: 17558345
Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2677-85
pubmed: 18074464
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Nov;133(48):2512-5
pubmed: 19021084
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct 1;180(7):640-8
pubmed: 19590022
J Immunol. 2011 Feb 15;186(4):2321-8
pubmed: 21257964
J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):872-7
pubmed: 21336191
Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R98
pubmed: 21418560
Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr;114(4):912-7
pubmed: 21427539
Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:253-78
pubmed: 2188664
J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):616-22
pubmed: 23089676
J Crit Care. 2013 Dec;28(6):1110.e7-1110.e10
pubmed: 23953491
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 16;(9):CD001090
pubmed: 24043371
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):1-9
pubmed: 24121723
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 21;17(5):R247
pubmed: 24144038
Crit Care. 2014 Feb 17;18(1):R34
pubmed: 24533868
J Intern Med. 2014 Oct;276(4):404-12
pubmed: 24815605
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 29;14:420
pubmed: 25074742
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1888-96
pubmed: 25217146
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:54-9
pubmed: 25475872
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1682-4
pubmed: 26088912
Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):5-12
pubmed: 26661744
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;16(7):819-827
pubmed: 26947523
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):224-232
pubmed: 27851857
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552
pubmed: 28098591
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):48-54
pubmed: 28100110
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):438-448
pubmed: 29632995
Arch Surg. 1985 Oct;120(10):1109-15
pubmed: 4038052
Clin Haematol. 1984 Feb;13(1):39-74
pubmed: 6233053
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10
pubmed: 8844239
Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998 Jan;36(1):67-8
pubmed: 9594089
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jul;24(7):663-72
pubmed: 9722035
Lancet. 1998 Oct 17;352(9136):1271-7
pubmed: 9788457
Arch Surg. 1998 Dec;133(12):1298-304
pubmed: 9865646