Diagnostic Performance of 4D CT and Sestamibi SPECT/CT in Localizing Parathyroid Adenomas in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
Adenoma
/ complications
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Area Under Curve
Female
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
/ methods
Humans
Hyperparathyroidism, Primary
/ complications
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Male
Middle Aged
Parathyroid Glands
/ diagnostic imaging
Parathyroid Neoplasms
/ complications
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
/ methods
Young Adult
Journal
Radiology
ISSN: 1527-1315
Titre abrégé: Radiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401260
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
3
2019
medline:
31
1
2020
entrez:
6
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background There currently is no consensus on the optimal localization procedure and imaging protocol for parathyroid adenoma. Parathyroid four-dimensional (4D) CT has emerged as a promising method for preoperative localization. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of parathyroid 4D CT and technetium 99m-sestamibi (hereafter, referred to as sestamibi) SPECT/CT in preoperative localization in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Materials and Methods This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent a combined imaging protocol of sestamibi SPECT/CT and 4D CT (noncontrast, contrast agent-enhanced, arterial, and delayed venous phases) acquired in a single setting from February 2013 to May 2016, with subsequent parathyroidectomy within 6 months. Reference standard for correct localization was on the basis of location denoted on operative reports, with pathologic confirmation of parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia. By using a four-quadrant analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for localization of the hyperfunctioning parathyroid gland or glands at sestamibi SPECT/CT and 4D CT were compared, per modality and in combination. Results Four hundred patients (319 women, 81 men; mean age, 61 years ± 14 [standard deviation]) were evaluated. Similar diagnostic performance was found in both combined 4D CT with sestamibi SPECT/CT and 4D CT alone (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88 [95% CI: 0.86, 0.90] and 0.87 [95% CI: 0.85, 0.90], respectively;
Identifiants
pubmed: 30835187
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182122
pmc: PMC7440755
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
469-476Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):15-24
pubmed: 24354373
Surgery. 2015 Mar;157(3):534-9
pubmed: 25660183
JAMA Surg. 2016 Oct 1;151(10):959-968
pubmed: 27532368
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Apr 15;:
pubmed: 29656552
Surgery. 2003 Dec;134(6):973-9; discussion 979-81
pubmed: 14668730
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):956-960
pubmed: 27329424
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Mar;152(3):438-43
pubmed: 25518904
Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):789-95
pubmed: 22798226
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;22(1):139-45
pubmed: 25074663
Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):334-8; discussion 338
pubmed: 21367374
Surgery. 2006 Dec;140(6):932-40; discussion 940-1
pubmed: 17188140
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):176-81
pubmed: 23868155
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43
pubmed: 6878708
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1476-1482
pubmed: 27515539
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Mar;132(3):359-72
pubmed: 15746845
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1723-8
pubmed: 21184187