Evaluation of detection probabilities at the water-filtering and initial PCR steps in environmental DNA metabarcoding using a multispecies site occupancy model.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 03 2019
05 03 2019
Historique:
received:
12
12
2017
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
7
3
2019
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a recently developed method to assess biodiversity based on a high-throughput parallel DNA sequencing applied to DNA present in the ecosystem. Although eDNA metabarcoding enables a rapid assessment of biodiversity, it is prone to species detection errors that may occur at sequential steps in field sampling, laboratory experiments, and bioinformatics. In this study, we illustrate how the error rates in the eDNA metabarcoding-based species detection can be accounted for by applying the multispecies occupancy modelling framework. We report a case study with the eDNA sample from an aquarium tank in which the detection probabilities of species in the two major steps of eDNA metabarcoding, filtration and PCR, across a range of PCR annealing temperatures, were examined. We also show that the results can be used to examine the efficiency of species detection under a given experimental design and setting, in terms of the efficiency of species detection, highlighting the usefulness of the multispecies site occupancy modelling framework to study the optimum conditions for molecular experiments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30837589
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40233-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-40233-1
pmc: PMC6401178
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
DNA
9007-49-2
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3581Références
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 May;16(3):604-7
pubmed: 27062589
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jul;10(7):1835-44
pubmed: 11472550
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 18;8:14087
pubmed: 28098255
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 30;7:12544
pubmed: 27572523
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015 Mar;407(7):1841-8
pubmed: 25577362
Mol Ecol. 2017 Nov;26(21):5872-5895
pubmed: 28921802
Biol Lett. 2008 Aug 23;4(4):423-5
pubmed: 18400683
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40368
pubmed: 28079122
Genome. 2016 Sep;59(9):705-23
pubmed: 27611697
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 May;16(3):673-85
pubmed: 26558345
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41732
pubmed: 22952584
Ecology. 2006 Apr;87(4):842-54
pubmed: 16676528
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e86175
pubmed: 24454960
Ecology. 2006 Apr;87(4):835-41
pubmed: 16676527
Mol Ecol. 2012 Jun;21(11):2565-73
pubmed: 22151771
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4481-9
pubmed: 22492459
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 May;60(2):341-50
pubmed: 17343679
Ecol Lett. 2010 Jun;13(6):659-74
pubmed: 20426794
Mol Ecol Resour. 2015 May;15(3):543-56
pubmed: 25327646
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Mar;16(2):415-22
pubmed: 26307935
Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(4):929-42
pubmed: 26479867
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Jul;16(4):837-44
pubmed: 27037675
Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994 Oct;3(5):294-9
pubmed: 7881515
Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):2045-50
pubmed: 22486824
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0122763
pubmed: 25799582
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Mar;14(2):306-23
pubmed: 24128180
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 5;49(9):5601-8
pubmed: 25850372
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35868
pubmed: 22563411
R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Jul 22;2(7):150088
pubmed: 26587265
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;7(3):210-20
pubmed: 15196487
Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov;39(21):e145
pubmed: 21930509