Profile of Women Initiated on Denosumab and Pattern of Use in a Restricted Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Indication: A French Database Analysis Over the Period 2013-2014.
Appropriateness of use
Database
Denosumab
France
Postmenopausal osteoporosis
Rheumatology
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
14
01
2019
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
15
4
2020
entrez:
7
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
French authorities have approved the reimbursement of denosumab as a second-line therapy after bisphosphonates (BPs) in women presenting with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) at high risk of fracture. By using a nationally representative claims database, we analyzed the pattern of denosumab use. The objectives of this study were to describe the profile of women initiated with denosumab over the 14-month period after launch and to check as far back as possible for the appropriateness of its use regarding the restrictions brought by French health authorities. A retrospective study using a national representative claims database, i.e., the "Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires" (EGB), was performed. The population was composed of women aged ≥ 40 years old who had an initiation of a PMO treatment in 2013 or 2014. The denosumab women's profiles were compared with those of women that started any other PMO treatment (except denosumab) over the same period. In 2013 and 2014, we identified 256 women who initiated denosumab. Denosumab was primarily prescribed by specialists (75%) compared with the other PMO treatments (37.6%). Patients on denosumab were significantly older, 73.2 versus 69.1 years old, and they more frequently had a history of fractures (20.7% versus 17.4%, NS) and chronic uptake of high-dose steroids (25% versus 22.8%, NS). Of the women initiated with denosumab, 93.8% had undergone a previous PMO treatment (during the 2005-2014 period). In 92.9% of cases, it was a BP alone or in association. This study suggests satisfactory compliance of prescribers concerning the restriction of the reimbursed indication of denosumab in second line after bisphosphonates with 6.2% possible inappropriate prescriptions. Amgen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30838517
doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00919-4
pii: 10.1007/s12325-019-00919-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Diphosphonates
0
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.7746452']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
969-975Références
Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C. FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:756–65.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493
pubmed: 19671655
https://www.hassante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/01-11/prolia_ct_10890.pdf
Bezin J, Duong M, Lassalle R, Droz C, Pariente A, Blin P, Moore N. The national healthcare system claims databases in France, SNIIRAM and EGB: powerful tools for pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4233 .
doi: 10.1002/pds.4233
pubmed: 28771878
Curran D, Maravic M, Kiefer P, Tochon V, Fardellone P. Epidemiology of osteoporosis-related fractures in France: a literature review. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:546–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.02.006
pubmed: 20378383
Maravic M, Le Bihan C, Landais P, Fardellone P. Incidence cost of osteoporotic fractures in France during, 2001 A methodological approach by the national hospital database. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1475–80.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2031-0
pubmed: 16217587
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.
doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
pubmed: 3558716
Bannay A, Chaignot C, Blotière PO, Basson M, Weill A, Ricordeau P, Alla F. The best use of the charlson comorbidity index with electronic health hare database to predict mortality. Med Care. 2016;54(2):188-94.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000471
pubmed: 26683778
Hadji P, Papaioannou N, Gielen E, Feudjo Tepie M, Zhang E, Frieling I, Geusens P, Makras P, Resch H, Möller G, Kalouche-Khalil L, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Persistence, adherence, and medication-taking behavior in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium: 12-month results from a European non-interventional study. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:2479–89.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3164-4
pubmed: 26018090
pmcid: 4575374
Karlsson L, Lundkvist J, Psachoulia E, Intorcia M, Ström O. Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26:2401–11.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3253-4
pubmed: 26282229
pmcid: 4575381
Mignot MA, Taisne N, Legroux I. Cortet B, Paccou J Bisphosphonate drug holidays in postmenopausal osteoporosis: effect on clinical fracture risk. Osteoporos Int. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4215-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4215-9
pubmed: 28875236
Briot K, Cortet B, Thomas T, Audran M, Blain H, Breuil V, Chapuis L, Chapurlat R, Fardellone P, Feron JM, Gauvain JB, Guggenbuhl P, Kolta S, Lespessailles E, Letombe B, Marcelli C, Orcel P, Seret P, Trémollières F, Roux C. 2012 update of French guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(3):304–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.02.014
pubmed: 22521109