Altruistic decisions are influenced by the allocation of monetary incentives in a pain-sharing game.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2018
accepted:
14
02
2019
entrez:
7
3
2019
pubmed:
7
3
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Altruistic behavior is essential to the sustainability of society, but our current understanding of its underlying motivation is limited. In addition to the intrinsic motives to help others, based on empathy, extrinsic motives such as monetary incentives and social reputation influence prosociality. The purpose of this study was to examine the underlying motivations of prosocial behavior under constant or increasing extrinsic motivation settings. An experimental task, Altruistic Pain Sharing, was developed in which the participants were asked to share the other participants' pain. In the session with monetary incentives, the incentives were given either constantly (CONSTANT condition) or proportionally (INCREASING condition), to the amount of shared pain. In addition, monetary incentives were not provided in the NO session. The participants experienced different amounts of mechanical pain at the beginning of the task and chose the number of pain stimulations to share, based on their experiences. Compared to the NO session, the INCREASING session exhibited a rise in the mean of shared pain, but not the CONSTANT session. Furthermore, there was a distinct tendency to receive less pain than the other participant in the CONSTANT session, and a tendency to receive more pain than the other participant in the INCREASING session. Prosocial behavior was influenced by the presence, as well as the form, of the extrinsic monetary incentives. Our study shows that rewards incentivize individuals to demonstrate a higher level of prosocial behavior, implying that prosocial behavior is itself a mixture of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, and that an effectively designed rewards system may function to enhance prosocial behavior.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Altruistic behavior is essential to the sustainability of society, but our current understanding of its underlying motivation is limited. In addition to the intrinsic motives to help others, based on empathy, extrinsic motives such as monetary incentives and social reputation influence prosociality. The purpose of this study was to examine the underlying motivations of prosocial behavior under constant or increasing extrinsic motivation settings.
METHODS
An experimental task, Altruistic Pain Sharing, was developed in which the participants were asked to share the other participants' pain. In the session with monetary incentives, the incentives were given either constantly (CONSTANT condition) or proportionally (INCREASING condition), to the amount of shared pain. In addition, monetary incentives were not provided in the NO session. The participants experienced different amounts of mechanical pain at the beginning of the task and chose the number of pain stimulations to share, based on their experiences.
RESULTS
Compared to the NO session, the INCREASING session exhibited a rise in the mean of shared pain, but not the CONSTANT session. Furthermore, there was a distinct tendency to receive less pain than the other participant in the CONSTANT session, and a tendency to receive more pain than the other participant in the INCREASING session.
CONCLUSION
Prosocial behavior was influenced by the presence, as well as the form, of the extrinsic monetary incentives. Our study shows that rewards incentivize individuals to demonstrate a higher level of prosocial behavior, implying that prosocial behavior is itself a mixture of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, and that an effectively designed rewards system may function to enhance prosocial behavior.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30840681
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213104
pii: PONE-D-18-31515
pmc: PMC6402679
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0213104Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):955-62
pubmed: 19594859
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Feb;103(1):178-219
pubmed: 24748682
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136521
pubmed: 26313946
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2013 Jul;18(4):326-54
pubmed: 23106125
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 30;5:15389
pubmed: 26515529
J Health Econ. 2011 Jul;30(4):637-46
pubmed: 21683460
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13407-10
pubmed: 26460026
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19761-6
pubmed: 22106300
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):20911-6
pubmed: 21078974
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23-48
pubmed: 20822437
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 1;57(3):1273-80
pubmed: 21596143
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):412-4
pubmed: 17148417
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 10;112(6):1654-5
pubmed: 25587135
Rev Econ Stat. 2015 Oct;97(4):725-741
pubmed: 26769985
J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75
pubmed: 15162935
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Aug;15(8):549-62
pubmed: 24986556
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 10;112(6):E510-5
pubmed: 25583494
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;108:156-65
pubmed: 24641880
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Apr;104(4):1320-1349
pubmed: 25170174
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23223
pubmed: 22003380
Neuroimage. 2016 Mar;128:74-84
pubmed: 26707890
Neuron. 2008 Apr 24;58(2):284-94
pubmed: 18439412
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e83454
pubmed: 24376705
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:347-56
pubmed: 25462694
Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):466-9
pubmed: 16421576
Vox Sang. 2018 Apr;113(3):205-219
pubmed: 29243265
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):E10291-E10300
pubmed: 29146826
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):389-96
pubmed: 26913619
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 19;8(4):e61526
pubmed: 23620760
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1315-23
pubmed: 20031986
J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349-54
pubmed: 13813058
Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan-Mar;3(1):28-34
pubmed: 28971831
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Aug;26(8):1861-70
pubmed: 24564471
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 31;6:31961
pubmed: 27578563
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):451-62
pubmed: 26182424
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:951-61
pubmed: 24099849
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):243-262
pubmed: 26708170
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Oct 18;108(42):17302-7
pubmed: 21987799
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):880-93
pubmed: 21782263
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):675-80
pubmed: 22504346
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e77041
pubmed: 24260101
Psychiatry Investig. 2010 Mar;7(1):24-30
pubmed: 20396429
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 10;9:484
pubmed: 29692749