Association of CD11b+ Monocytes and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections in Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
CD11b Antigen
/ metabolism
Choroid Diseases
/ drug therapy
Choroidal Neovascularization
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Middle Aged
Monocytes
/ metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ drug therapy
Journal
JAMA ophthalmology
ISSN: 2168-6173
Titre abrégé: JAMA Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
pmc-release:
07
03
2020
pubmed:
8
3
2019
medline:
19
2
2020
entrez:
8
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CD11b+ immune cells have been implicated in the formation of choroidal neovascularization in experimental studies on animals and disease-association studies on humans. However, the clinical importance of such observations remains unknown. To investigate whether the proportion of CD11b+ circulating monocytes is associated with the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). These observational cohort studies collected data from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2013, and from January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2018. Fresh venous blood samples were acquired for flow cytometric immune studies in patients with neovascular AMD or PCV receiving treatment with aflibercept or ranibizumab as needed for 36 months. Patients (n = 81) without immune diseases were consecutively recruited from a single center in Denmark. Proportion of CD11b+ circulating monocytes. The estimation of the number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections given at 12, 24, and 36 months by the proportion of CD11b+ circulating monocytes and the correlation between these values. The angiogenic role of CD11b+ circulating monocytes was further evaluated by investigating the expression of the known proangiogenic receptor CCR2. Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis (54% women; mean [SD] age, 76 [7] years). The proportion of CD11b+ monocytes at baseline positively estimated the future number of anti-VEGF injections at 12 (ρ = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.35-0.93; P = .004), 24 (ρ = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.44-0.95; P = .002), and 36 (ρ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.34-0.94; P = .005) months. This association was also found retrospectively in a larger sample of patients with neovascular AMD at 12 (ρ = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.16-0.68; P = .004), 24 (ρ = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.20-0.70; P = .002), and 36 (ρ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41-0.80; P < .001) months and patients with PCV at 12 (ρ = 0.27; 95% CI, -0.28 to 0.68; P = .30), 24 (ρ = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.12-0.85; P = .02), and 36 (ρ = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.27-0.90; P = .005) months, suggesting that this association is not specific to AMD but rather reflects VEGF activity in neovascularization. CD11b+ monocytes highly coexpressed CCR2, an important monocytic marker of proangiogenic activity. Results of this study demonstrated that the proportion of circulating CD11b+ monocytes estimated and correlated with the number of anti-VEGF injections in patients with neovascular AMD and PCV. Additional longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these findings have clinical relevance to influence treatment algorithms or provide novel targets for medical therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30844038
pii: 2726702
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0010
pmc: PMC6512268
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
CD11b Antigen
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
515-522Références
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Jan;29(1):19-29
pubmed: 19854291
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;122(7):1013-8
pubmed: 15249366
J Neuroinflammation. 2017 Feb 23;14(1):42
pubmed: 28231837
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4729-37
pubmed: 18586873
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;186:174-175
pubmed: 29273319
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Oct 1;58(12):5242-5250
pubmed: 29049725
Immunity. 2017 Feb 21;46(2):261-272
pubmed: 28228282
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 16;7(1):8433
pubmed: 28814744
Dan Med J. 2017 Nov;64(11):
pubmed: 29115208
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;46(6):661-669
pubmed: 29360187
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):1029-37
pubmed: 23410964
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;98(3):408-12
pubmed: 24357496
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Aug;44(8):3578-85
pubmed: 12882810
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov 1;57(14):5843-5855
pubmed: 27802514
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 07;53(9):5292-300
pubmed: 22789920
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;154(1):193-199.e2
pubmed: 22541656
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;95(5):472-480
pubmed: 27860298
Clin Chem. 2001 Jan;47(1):28-30
pubmed: 11148173
Am J Pathol. 2017 Dec;187(12):2841-2857
pubmed: 28941979
Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1728-38
pubmed: 22559899
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):260-6
pubmed: 16458093
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2017 Oct 04;11:176-180
pubmed: 30128371
Curr Mol Med. 2016;16(4):412-23
pubmed: 27009107
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Aug;44(8):3586-92
pubmed: 12882811
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017 Nov;61:98-128
pubmed: 28602950
Retina. 2018 Dec;38(12):2363-2371
pubmed: 29059101
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jun 1;58(7):3240-3248
pubmed: 28660277
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 04;6:29046
pubmed: 27374485
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;801:199-205
pubmed: 24664699
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep;152(3):396-399.e1
pubmed: 21669404
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;96(7):e789-e796
pubmed: 29536657
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 1;135(8):835-843
pubmed: 28655032
Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(1):29-41
pubmed: 28092911
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001 May;20(3):385-414
pubmed: 11286898
EMBO Mol Med. 2013 Nov;5(11):1775-93
pubmed: 24142887
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1221-e1234
pubmed: 29032195
Neurobiol Aging. 2017 Mar;51:71-82
pubmed: 28039766