Malnutrition in head and neck cancer patients: Impacts and indications of a prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Analysis of Variance
Body Mass Index
Deglutition Disorders
/ etiology
Female
Gastrostomy
/ adverse effects
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ complications
Health Status
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Malnutrition
/ etiology
Middle Aged
Nutritional Support
/ trends
Patient Readmission
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Weight Loss
Cancer
Endoscopic
Gastrostomy
Head
Malnutrition
Neck
Journal
European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases
ISSN: 1879-730X
Titre abrégé: Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101531465
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
08
07
2018
revised:
12
11
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients often experience malnutrition before and during treatment. Prophylactic gastrostomy has emerged as an efficient tool for ensuring adequate nutrition. However, there is no suitable algorithm able to identify patients at high risk of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to describe the nutritional management, to assess the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy, and to identify predictors of malnutrition. This retrospective study included 152 patients treated with surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for HNC. The patients were classified according to their gastrostomy status (prophylactic or non-prophylactic). Nutritional, tumoral and treatment characteristics were reported. Clinical and nutritional outcomes were measured 6 weeks after the beginning of treatment. In order to describe the nutritional management and the impact of prophylactic gastrostomy on patients, univariate analysis was generated using chi-square test and Mann-Whitney test or Student's t-test. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with malnutrition. Forty-one patients received prophylactic gastrostomy whereas 111 patients had no nutritional support. Prophylactic gastrostomy placement was associated with a lower initial body mass index, with severe malnutrition, and with initial oral intake disorder. Patients who did not experienced prophylactic gastrostomy had much worse outcomes such as hospital readmissions (P=0.042), relative weight loss at 6 weeks (P<0.0001), dysphagia, severe malnutrition, and poor state of health (P=0.001). Our complication rates (4.9%) were lower than the usual range (5.9-9.3%) and no life-threatening complication was reported. Positive N status, oral intake disorder, concomitant radiochemotherapy, nasopharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal tumor site were significant predictive factors for malnutrition. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy showed advantages in terms of hospital readmissions, relative weight loss at 6 weeks, dysphagia, severe malnutrition, and poor state of health. Tumoral, nutritional and treatment characteristics seem to be predictors for malnutrition. Hence, physicians should integrate these factors in their nutrition algorithm approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30846293
pii: S1879-7296(19)30022-5
doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.01.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S27-S33Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.