Why do metopic sutural synostoses angulate? The concept of nasion sutural complex and its implication on the management of hypotelorism-early results and proof of concept.
Craniosynostoses
Metopic suture
Spring cranioplasty
Trigonocephaly
Journal
Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery
ISSN: 1433-0350
Titre abrégé: Childs Nerv Syst
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8503227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
29
01
2019
accepted:
27
02
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
30
9
2020
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Angulation at the suture is a hallmark of metopic synostoses amongst all craniosynostoses. No other sutural synostoses demonstrate angulation at synostoses consistently. We look into the possible aetiology and the implication of the understanding in the treatment goals of trigonocephaly. We hypothesise that the nasal bone and nasofrontal suture viz. "nasion sutural complex" are involved in trigonocephaly along with the well-accepted role of metopic suture. We propose that it is the angulation at this junction which leads to trigonocephaly and its secondary features. The study included seven infants, who underwent correction for trigonocephaly at our paediatric craniofacial division at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India, between the period July 2015 to March 2018. The cohort included were infants with trigonocephaly who had CT head for diagnosis. We analysed the multidimensional CT (MDCT) of these infants and compared to an equal number of age-matched controls. The controls were infants with other forms of sutural synostosis with metopic uninvolved and normal infants where MDCT was done for other reasons. Sutural characteristic at the nasion and metopic suture recorded in comparison with an equal number of age-matched controls. We performed spring cranioplasty for three infants after metopic suturectomy, extending the release beyond the nasion sutural complex, placing springs to distract the suture. The infants who underwent spring cranioplasty were followed up for the aesthetic outcome. Remaining infants of the study underwent standard frontorbital correction for metopic craniosynostoses. We could demonstrate a fusion of nasofrontal and nasal suture in all cases (n = 7) of trigonocephaly included in the study on MDCT and intraoperatively. We performed spring cranioplasty for three infants (n = 3/7), where we released the internasal suture. At 3 months follow-up, along with correction of the angulation, the hypotelorism improved significantly. Other infants in the study (4/7) underwent classical frontorbital advancement. Fusion of nasion sutural complex along with metopic sutures may explain the angulation in trigonocephaly. We propose that all minimally invasive techniques for correction of trigonocephaly and associated hypotelorism should consider this fact for an improved outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30847619
doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04112-4
pii: 10.1007/s00381-019-04112-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
907-912Références
J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Nov;12(6):527-32
pubmed: 11711818
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2002 Dec;13(6):437-45
pubmed: 12529772
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Oct;112(5):1211-8
pubmed: 14504503
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Mar;29(2):118-28
pubmed: 1571345
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;26(6):618-21
pubmed: 16193520
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):977-84
pubmed: 17312504
Childs Nerv Syst. 2012 Sep;28(9):1359-67
pubmed: 22872249
Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Dec;29(12):2189-94
pubmed: 22914920
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Feb;48(1):63-6
pubmed: 23848421
Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Dec;29(12):2163
pubmed: 23929134
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Jul;67(7):900-5
pubmed: 24820454
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Aug;18(2):201-6
pubmed: 27129093
J Anat. 1988 Dec;161:203-15
pubmed: 3254893
Neurosurgery. 1986 Aug;19(2):228-34
pubmed: 3748350
Neurosurgery. 1981 Feb;8(2):143-9
pubmed: 7207779
Radiology. 1981 Sep;140(3):681-8
pubmed: 7280235
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Aug;96(2):299-309; discussion 310-5
pubmed: 7624402
Clin Plast Surg. 1994 Oct;21(4):555-62
pubmed: 7813155
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Nov;94(6):759-67
pubmed: 7972420
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Jan;93(1):16-24
pubmed: 8278471