Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study.
Adult
Bone Plates
Clavicle
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal
/ adverse effects
Fractures, Bone
/ diagnosis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Open Fracture Reduction
/ adverse effects
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Radiography
/ methods
Recovery of Function
Clavicle hook plate
Lateral clavicle fracture
Plate fixation
Superior clavicle plate with lateral extension
Unstable
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
07
10
2018
accepted:
01
03
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
27
12
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Different fixation methods are used for treatment of unstable lateral clavicle fractures (LCF). Definitive consensus and guidelines for the surgical fixation of LCF have not been established. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate (CHP) and the superior clavicle plate with lateral extension (SCPLE). A dual-center retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients operatively treated for unstable Neer type II and type V LCF between 2011 and 2016, with the CHP (n = 23) or SCPLE (n = 53), were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcomes were the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, complications, and implant removal. A total of 67 patients (88%) were available for the final follow-up. There was a significant difference in bicortical lateral fragment size, 15 mm (± 4, range 6-21) in the CPH group compared to 20 mm (± 8, range 8-43) in the SCPLE group (p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score (CHP; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-0.0], SCPLE; 0.00 [IQR 0.0-4.5]; p = 0.073) or other functional outcome scores (NRS at rest; p = 0.373, NRS during activity; p = 0.559). There was no significant difference in median QuickDASH score or other functional outcome scores between Neer type II and type V fractures. There was no significant difference in complication rate, CHP 11% and SCPLE 8% (relative risk 1.26; [95% CI 0.25-6.33; p = 0.777]). The implant removal rate was 100% in the CHP group compared to 42% in the SCPLE group (relative risk 2.40; [95% CI 1.72-3.35; p ≤ 0.001]). Both the CHP and SCPLE are effective fixation methods for the treatment of unstable LCF, resulting in excellent patient-reported functional outcome and similar complication rates. SCPLE fixation is an effective fixation method for the treatment of both Neer type II and type V LCF. The SCPLE has a lower implant removal rate. Therefore, if technically feasible, we recommend SCPLE fixation for the treatment of unstable LCF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30847678
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9
pii: 10.1007/s00590-019-02411-9
pmc: PMC6570672
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
989-997Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Jun;14(2):115-20
pubmed: 23400771
Orthopedics. 2013 Jun;36(6):801-7
pubmed: 23746019
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 May;137(5):651-662
pubmed: 28321570
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 May;80(3):476-84
pubmed: 9619941
Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-404
pubmed: 21856077
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3344-50
pubmed: 21866422
Int Orthop. 2014 Jul;38(7):1461-8
pubmed: 24728348
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;5(2):65-73
pubmed: 25983473
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):700-4
pubmed: 25457780
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44
pubmed: 16709254
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2002-2003;61(1-2):32-9
pubmed: 12828377
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):452-6
pubmed: 12378163
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Feb;20(1):45-48
pubmed: 28233729
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Apr;127(3):191-4
pubmed: 17221230
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Mar;(300):127-32
pubmed: 8131324
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Nov 19;15:380
pubmed: 25406639
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Apr;131(4):525-33
pubmed: 20967548
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46
pubmed: 15866967
J Orthop Surg Res. 2012 Jan 11;7:2
pubmed: 22236647
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Sep;23(8):570-4
pubmed: 19704272
J Trauma. 1963 Mar;3:99-110
pubmed: 13937900
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1S):S53-S59
pubmed: 28043849
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968 May-Jun;58:43-50
pubmed: 5666866
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):532-539
pubmed: 27830484