Surgical growth guidance with non-fused anchoring segments in early-onset scoliosis.
Adolescent
Bone Screws
/ adverse effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kyphosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Orthopedic Procedures
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
Radiography
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Spinal Fusion
/ methods
Spine
/ growth & development
Suture Anchors
Treatment Outcome
Early-onset scoliosis
Early-onset spinal deformities
Growing rods
Growth guidance
Non-fusion anchoring
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2018
accepted:
26
02
2019
revised:
10
02
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
9
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) requires a balance between maintained curve correction and the capacity for spinal and thoracic growth. Spinal fusion creates irreversible conditions that prevent the implementation of further treatment methods. Our hypothesis was that non-fused anchors in growth guidance show a comparable outcome as the technique described in the literature, which involves spondylodesis of the anchoring segments. This retrospective study analysed 148 surgeries in 22 EOS patients (11 female, 11 male) over a 15-year period. Patients underwent surgery with non-fused anchors and growth guidance techniques. Scoliosis, kyphosis, growth and anchoring segments were measured. For the latter, a new measuring technique was developed. Complications were recorded and classified. The mean Cobb angle reduced from 73.5 ± 24.4° to 28.4 ± 16.2° (60.2 ± 22.9%, p < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Spinal growth T1-S1 and T1-T12 were 41.1 ± 23.3 mm and 24.9 ± 16.6 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. Growth at the cranial and caudal anchoring segment was 1.5 mm/segment/year and 1.9 mm/segment/year, respectively. A total of 63 complications were documented in 20 patients, with 40 requiring unplanned revision surgery. Definitive spondylodesis was performed in three patients. Patients demonstrated a significant spinal growth including the anchoring segments. A comparable correction in Cobb angle and the type of complications was noted, although the rate of device-related complications was higher. No permanent impairment was reported. The rate of device-related complications is acceptable and outweighed by the significant degree of growth preservation and more flexible and individualised treatment strategy for patients with EOS. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30848364
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05934-1
pii: 10.1007/s00586-019-05934-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1301-1313Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1169-81
pubmed: 11507125
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):E460-6
pubmed: 12438997
Orthopade. 2004 Aug;33(8):911-8
pubmed: 15257432
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 1;30(17 Suppl):S46-57
pubmed: 16138066
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2039-44
pubmed: 16166892
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Feb 1;31(3):269-74
pubmed: 16449898
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89 Suppl 1:42-54
pubmed: 17272422
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Apr-May;27(3):354-61
pubmed: 17414025
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):984-90
pubmed: 18427320
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1815-27
pubmed: 19644333
Proc R Soc Med. 1961 Dec;54(12):1106-7
pubmed: 19994144
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jan;92(1):202-9
pubmed: 20048114
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Nov 3;92(15):2533-43
pubmed: 20889912
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2186-92
pubmed: 21102292
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2193-204
pubmed: 21102293
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):1639-44
pubmed: 21738096
Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1892-8
pubmed: 21766167
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 1;37(15):1303-9
pubmed: 22210014
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Mar;32(2):184-9
pubmed: 22327453
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Dec 15;37(26):E1639-44
pubmed: 22990366
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 15;38(8):E464-8
pubmed: 23370680
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jan;34(1):1-7
pubmed: 23934092
Eur Spine J. 2014 Jan;23(1):198-208
pubmed: 23978993
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Apr-May;34(3):260-74
pubmed: 23995146
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 2;95(19):1745-50
pubmed: 24088966
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3902-8
pubmed: 25059852
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22):E1311-7
pubmed: 25299170
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):798-803
pubmed: 25575362
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Oct;101(6 Suppl):S281-8
pubmed: 26386889
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jun;26(6):1748-1755
pubmed: 27942940
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Dec;37(8):e606-e611
pubmed: 28244928
Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):122-129
pubmed: 28687252
Spine Deform. 2018 Sep - Oct;6(5):607-613
pubmed: 30122398