Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Loosening of Revision Hip Prosthesis: A Comparison Between MARS and non-MARS Images.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ instrumentation
Female
Hip
/ diagnostic imaging
Hip Prosthesis
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Failure
/ adverse effects
Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
/ methods
Reoperation
/ instrumentation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Journal
Journal of computer assisted tomography
ISSN: 1532-3145
Titre abrégé: J Comput Assist Tomogr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
12
3
2019
medline:
4
6
2019
entrez:
12
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was to assess potential endoprosthesis loosening in patients after revision total hip arthroplasty, based on monochromatic dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images obtained with and without metal artifact reduction software (MARS) and comparison with the clinical examination and hip function. Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent DECT examinations. Two monochromatic data sets were generated: with MARS (75-keV MARS) and without MARS (140-keV non-MARS) and evaluated for signs of loosening, using a dedicated radiological score. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to evaluate patients' hip function. The mean radiological score for loosening in the non-MARS group was 16.2, in the MARS group 17.0 and was significantly higher (P < 0.001). Radiological loosening evaluation in non-MARS images correlated with the HHS score (ρ = 0.43, P = 0.03), whereas there was no correlation between MARS images and HHS (ρ = 0.15, P = 0.47). New MARS-related artifacts, which hinder implant-bone interface evaluation, were found in 75-keV MARS images ("pseudo-loosening" in 33 of 34 prostheses, "ground-glass blurring" in 20 of 32). High-energy monochromatic DECT images are superior to low-energy DECT MARS images in assessment of the potential loosening and correlate better with the clinical examination outcomes. For revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation, 2 data sets should be assessed inseparably because of extra artifacts in MARS images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30855312
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000850
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM