Estimating patient-specific treatment advantages in the 'Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study'.


Journal

Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 26 02 2018
revised: 12 01 2019
accepted: 25 02 2019
pubmed: 12 3 2019
medline: 23 6 2020
entrez: 12 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The 'Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study' (TADS, ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00006286) was a cornerstone, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of standard treatment options for major depression in adolescents. Whereas previous TADS analyses examined primarily effect modifications of treatment-placebo differences by various patient characteristics, less is known about the modification of inter-treatment differences, and hence, patient characteristics that might guide treatment selection. We sought to fill this gap by estimating patient-specific inter-treatment differences as a function of patients' baseline characteristics. We did so by applying the 'model-based random forest', a recently-introduced machine learning-based method for evaluating effect heterogeneity that allows for the estimation of patient-specific treatment effects as a function of arbitrary baseline characteristics. Treatment conditions were cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) alone, fluoxetine (FLX) alone, and the combination of CBT and fluoxetine (COMB). All inter-treatment differences (CBT vs. FLX; CBT vs. COMB; FLX vs. COMB) were evaluated across 23 potential effect modifiers extracted from previous studies. Overall, FLX was superior to CBT, while COMB was superior to both CBT and FLX. Evidence for effect heterogeneity was found for the CBT-FLX difference and the FLX-COMB difference, but not for the CBT-COMB difference. Baseline depression severity modified the CBT-FLX difference; whereas baseline depression severity, patients' treatment expectations, and childhood trauma modified the FLX-COMB difference. All modifications were quantitative rather than qualitative, however, meaning that the differences varied only in magnitude, but not direction. These findings imply that combining CBT with fluoxetine may be superior to either therapy used alone across a broad range of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30856378
pii: S0022-3956(18)30238-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.02.021
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation 0
Fluoxetine 01K63SUP8D

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00006286']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

61-70

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Simon Foster (S)

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction Associated with the University of Zurich, Konradstrasse 32, 8031, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (KJPP), University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, University of Zurich, Neumünsterallee 9, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: simon.foster@uzh.ch.

Meichun Mohler-Kuo (M)

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland; Swiss Research Institute for Public Health and Addiction Associated with the University of Zurich, Konradstrasse 32, 8031, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (KJPP), University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, University of Zurich, Neumünsterallee 9, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland; La Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Av. Vinet 30, 1004, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Lynette Tay (L)

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland.

Torsten Hothorn (T)

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland.

Heidi Seibold (H)

Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zürich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH