Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
/ methods
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
/ methods
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
Double-Blind Method
Echocardiography
Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Failure
/ diagnostic imaging
Hemodynamics
/ physiology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Biventricular pacing
Cardiac resynchronization
Heart failure
MPP
MultiPoint Pacing
Quadripolar left ventricular pacing
Randomized controlled study
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 09 2019
14 09 2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2018
revised:
26
08
2018
accepted:
16
02
2019
pubmed:
13
3
2019
medline:
6
11
2020
entrez:
13
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the impact of MultiPoint™ Pacing (MPP)-programmed according to the physician's discretion-in non-responders to standard biventricular pacing after 6 months. The study enrolled 1921 patients receiving a quadripolar cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system capable of MPP™ therapy. A core laboratory assessed echocardiography at baseline and 6 months and defined volumetric non-response to biventricular pacing as <15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Clinical sites randomized patients classified as non-responders in a 1:1 ratio to receive MPP (236 patients) or continued biventricular pacing (231 patients) for an additional 6 months and evaluated rate of conversion to echocardiographic response. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. No difference was observed in non-responder to responder conversion rate between MPP and biventricular pacing (31.8% and 33.8%, P = 0.72). In the MPP arm, 68 (29%) patients received MPP programmed with a wide LV electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest LV1-LV2 and LV2-RV timing delays (MPP-AS); 168 (71%) patients received MPP programmed with other settings (MPP-Other). MPP-AS elicited a significantly higher non-responder conversion rate compared to MPP-Other (45.6% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.006) and a trend in a higher conversion rate compared to biventricular pacing (45.6% vs. 33.8%, P = 0.10). After 6 months, investigator-discretionary MPP programming did not significantly increase echocardiographic response compared to biventricular pacing in CRT non-responders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30859220
pii: 5374839
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02006069']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2979-2987Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.