BEECH: a dose-finding run-in followed by a randomised phase II study assessing the efficacy of AKT inhibitor capivasertib (AZD5363) combined with paclitaxel in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, and in a PIK3CA mutant sub-population.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
/ genetics
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Pyrimidines
/ administration & dosage
Pyrroles
/ administration & dosage
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
Survival Rate
PIK3CA
AKT inhibitor
ER+
HER2–
capivasertib
metastatic breast cancer
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
13
3
2019
medline:
13
6
2020
entrez:
13
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+). BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population. Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups. Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BEECH investigated the efficacy of capivasertib (AZD5363), an oral inhibitor of AKT isoforms 1-3, in combination with the first-line weekly paclitaxel for advanced or metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide mutation sub-population (PIK3CA+).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
BEECH consisted of an open-label, phase Ib safety run-in (part A) in 38 patients with advanced breast cancer, and a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II expansion (part B) in 110 women with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. In part A, patients received paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) with capivasertib taken twice daily (b.i.d.) at two intermittent ascending dosing schedules. In part B, patients were randomly assigned, stratified by PIK3CA mutation status, to receive paclitaxel with either capivasertib or placebo. The primary end point for part A was safety to recommend a dose and schedule for part B; primary end points for part B were progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall and PIK3CA+ sub-population.
RESULTS
Capivasertib was well tolerated, with a 400 mg b.i.d. 4 days on/3 days off treatment schedule selected in part A. In part B, median PFS in the overall population was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 8.4 months with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; P = 0.308]. In the PIK3CA+ sub-population, median PFS was 10.9 months with capivasertib versus 10.8 months with placebo (HR 1.11; P = 0.760). Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event v4.0, the most common grade ≥3 adverse events in the capivasertib group were diarrhoea, hyperglycaemia, neutropoenia and maculopapular rash. Dose intensity of paclitaxel was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Capivasertib had no apparent impact on the tolerability and dose intensity of paclitaxel. Adding capivasertib to weekly paclitaxel did not prolong PFS in the overall population or PIK3CA+ sub-population of ER+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01625286.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30860570
pii: S0923-7534(19)31171-8
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz086
pmc: PMC6551452
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Pyrimidines
0
Pyrroles
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases
EC 2.7.1.137
PIK3CA protein, human
EC 2.7.1.137
AKT1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
EC 2.7.11.1
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
capivasertib
WFR23M21IE
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01625286']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
774-780Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Références
Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Apr;11(4):873-87
pubmed: 22294718
Anticancer Res. 2016 Nov;36(11):5849-5858
pubmed: 27793908
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;77(4):787-95
pubmed: 26931343
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 1;24(9):2050-2059
pubmed: 29066505
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;76(2):343-56
pubmed: 26092323
Oncol Rep. 2008 May;19(5):1099-107
pubmed: 18425364
Cancer Treat Rev. 2010 Feb;36(1):69-74
pubmed: 19945225
Science. 2017 Mar 24;355(6331):1324-1330
pubmed: 28336670
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 10;(6):CD003366
pubmed: 26058962
Cancer Cell. 2009 Aug 4;16(2):115-25
pubmed: 19647222
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2059-2066
pubmed: 27573562
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 6;277(36):33490-500
pubmed: 12087097
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 1;16(11):2999-3010
pubmed: 20404007
Ann Oncol. 2017 Feb 1;28(2):313-320
pubmed: 27803006
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2251-2259
pubmed: 28489509
Mol Cancer Ther. 2002 Jul;1(9):707-17
pubmed: 12479367
Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 1;68(15):6084-91
pubmed: 18676830
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;34(31):3803-3815
pubmed: 27621407
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Dec;15(6):473-481.e3
pubmed: 26051240
Mol Cancer Ther. 2011 Jun;10(6):1093-101
pubmed: 21490305
Curr Top Med Chem. 2010;10(4):458-77
pubmed: 20180757
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 05;10(11):e0141763
pubmed: 26540293
Br J Cancer. 2005 Aug 8;93(3):293-301
pubmed: 16052223
Nature. 2012 Jun 10;486(7403):353-60
pubmed: 22722193
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Sep;14(9):2035-48
pubmed: 26116361
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15;7(283):283ra51
pubmed: 25877889
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):811-821
pubmed: 27155741
Ann Oncol. 2009 Nov;20(11):1771-85
pubmed: 19608616
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1360-1372
pubmed: 28800861