Addressing the First Delay in Saving Mothers, Giving Life Districts in Uganda and Zambia: Approaches and Results for Increasing Demand for Facility Delivery Services.
Journal
Global health, science and practice
ISSN: 2169-575X
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Sci Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101624414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 03 2019
11 03 2019
Historique:
received:
16
09
2018
accepted:
29
01
2019
entrez:
15
3
2019
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
11
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL), a 5-year initiative implemented in selected districts in Uganda and Zambia, was designed to reduce deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth by targeting the 3 delays to receiving appropriate care at birth. While originally the "Three Delays" model was designed to focus on curative services that encompass emergency obstetric care, SMGL expanded its application to primary and secondary prevention of obstetric complications. Prevention of the "first delay" focused on addressing factors influencing the decision to seek delivery care at a health facility. Numerous factors can contribute to the first delay, including a lack of birth planning, unfamiliarity with pregnancy danger signs, poor perceptions of facility care, and financial or geographic barriers. SMGL addressed these barriers through community engagement on safe motherhood, public health outreach, community workers who identified pregnant women and encouraged facility delivery, and incentives to deliver in a health facility. SMGL used qualitative and quantitative methods to describe intervention strategies, intervention outcomes, and health impacts. Partner reports, health facility assessments (HFAs), facility and community surveillance, and population-based mortality studies were used to document activities and measure health outcomes in SMGL-supported districts. SMGL's approach led to unprecedented community outreach on safe motherhood issues in SMGL districts. About 3,800 community health care workers in Uganda and 1,558 in Zambia were engaged. HFAs indicated that facility deliveries rose significantly in SMGL districts. In Uganda, the proportion of births that took place in facilities rose from 45.5% to 66.8% (47% increase); similarly, in Zambia SMGL districts, facility deliveries increased from 62.6% to 90.2% (44% increase). In both countries, the proportion of women delivering in facilities equipped to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care also increased (from 28.2% to 41.0% in Uganda and from 26.0% to 29.1% in Zambia). The districts documented declines in the number of maternal deaths due to not accessing facility care during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period in both countries. This reduction played a significant role in the decline of the maternal mortality ratio in SMGL-supported districts in Uganda but not in Zambia. Further work is needed to sustain gains and to eliminate preventable maternal and perinatal deaths.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30867209
pii: GHSP-D-18-00343
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00343
pmc: PMC6519679
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S48-S67Informations de copyright
© Serbanescu et al.
Références
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1284-99
pubmed: 17027735
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Feb;19(2):95-8
pubmed: 19208312
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34
pubmed: 19671156
Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):209-16
pubmed: 20537423
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Dec 7;59(10):1-126
pubmed: 22808755
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;26(5):388-97
pubmed: 22882783
J Trop Pediatr. 2013 Apr;59(2):100-5
pubmed: 23174990
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jan 1;92(1):51-9
pubmed: 24391300
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 27;14:89
pubmed: 24576187
Health Educ Res. 2014 Jun;29(3):521-32
pubmed: 24663431
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 10;14:212
pubmed: 24884489
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 27;14:398
pubmed: 25427853
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(2):183-9
pubmed: 25546039
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 23;(3):CD007754
pubmed: 25803792
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 01;(12):CD010994
pubmed: 26621223
Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):587-603
pubmed: 26794078
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0153051
pubmed: 27101379
Glob Health Action. 2016 May 10;9:31408
pubmed: 27171766
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):42
pubmed: 28103836
J Glob Health. 2017 Jun;7(1):010908
pubmed: 28685046
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):216
pubmed: 28693518
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):219
pubmed: 28697794
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(suppl_5):v13-v21
pubmed: 29244103
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):431
pubmed: 29258475
J Health Popul Nutr. 2017 Dec 21;36(Suppl 1):48
pubmed: 29297392
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 16;18(1):101
pubmed: 29661240
Hum Resour Health. 2018 Aug 16;16(1):39
pubmed: 30115074
Int J Womens Health. 2018 Oct 05;10:589-601
pubmed: 30349403
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S6-S26
pubmed: 30867207
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S27-S47
pubmed: 30867208
Biometrics. 1986 Dec;42(4):693-734
pubmed: 3814721
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
pubmed: 8042057
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Apr;46(8):981-93
pubmed: 9579750