Community Perspectives of a 3-Delays Model Intervention: A Qualitative Evaluation of Saving Mothers, Giving Life in Zambia.


Journal

Global health, science and practice
ISSN: 2169-575X
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Sci Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101624414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 03 2019
Historique:
received: 04 08 2018
accepted: 25 10 2018
entrez: 15 3 2019
pubmed: 15 3 2019
medline: 11 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL), a health systems strengthening approach based on the 3-delays model, aimed to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in 6 districts in Zambia between 2012 and 2017. By 2016, the maternal mortality ratio in SMGL-supported districts declined by 41% compared to its level at the beginning of SMGL-from 480 to 284 deaths per 100,000 live births. The 10.5% annual reduction between the baseline and 2016 was about 4.5 times higher than the annual reduction rate for sub-Saharan Africa and about 2.6 times higher than the annual reduction estimated for Zambia as a whole. While outcome measures demonstrate reductions in maternal and perinatal mortality, this qualitative endline evaluation assessed community perceptions of the SMGL intervention package, including (1) messaging about use of maternal health services, (2) access to maternal health services, and (3) quality improvement of maternal health services. We used purposive sampling to conduct semistructured in-depth interviews with women who delivered at home (n=20), women who delivered in health facilities (n=20), community leaders (n=8), clinicians (n=15), and public health stakeholders (n=15). We also conducted 12 focus group discussions with a total of 93 men and women from the community and Safe Motherhood Action Group members. Data were coded and analyzed using NVivo version 10. Delay 1: Participants were receptive to SMGL's messages related to early antenatal care, health facility-based deliveries, and involving male partners in pregnancy and childbirth. However, top-down pressure to increase health facility deliveries led to unintended consequences, such as community-imposed penalty fees for home deliveries. Delay 2: Community members perceived some improvements, such as refurbished maternity waiting homes and dedicated maternity ambulances, but many still had difficulty reaching the health facilities in time to deliver. Delay 3: SMGL's clinician trainings were considered a strength, but the increased demand for health facility deliveries led to human resource challenges, which affected perceived quality of care. While SMGL's health systems strengthening approach aimed to reduce challenges related to the 3 delays, participants still reported significant barriers accessing maternal and newborn health care. More research is needed to understand the necessary intervention package to affect system-wide change.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL), a health systems strengthening approach based on the 3-delays model, aimed to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in 6 districts in Zambia between 2012 and 2017. By 2016, the maternal mortality ratio in SMGL-supported districts declined by 41% compared to its level at the beginning of SMGL-from 480 to 284 deaths per 100,000 live births. The 10.5% annual reduction between the baseline and 2016 was about 4.5 times higher than the annual reduction rate for sub-Saharan Africa and about 2.6 times higher than the annual reduction estimated for Zambia as a whole.
OBJECTIVES
While outcome measures demonstrate reductions in maternal and perinatal mortality, this qualitative endline evaluation assessed community perceptions of the SMGL intervention package, including (1) messaging about use of maternal health services, (2) access to maternal health services, and (3) quality improvement of maternal health services.
METHODS
We used purposive sampling to conduct semistructured in-depth interviews with women who delivered at home (n=20), women who delivered in health facilities (n=20), community leaders (n=8), clinicians (n=15), and public health stakeholders (n=15). We also conducted 12 focus group discussions with a total of 93 men and women from the community and Safe Motherhood Action Group members. Data were coded and analyzed using NVivo version 10.
RESULTS
Delay 1: Participants were receptive to SMGL's messages related to early antenatal care, health facility-based deliveries, and involving male partners in pregnancy and childbirth. However, top-down pressure to increase health facility deliveries led to unintended consequences, such as community-imposed penalty fees for home deliveries. Delay 2: Community members perceived some improvements, such as refurbished maternity waiting homes and dedicated maternity ambulances, but many still had difficulty reaching the health facilities in time to deliver. Delay 3: SMGL's clinician trainings were considered a strength, but the increased demand for health facility deliveries led to human resource challenges, which affected perceived quality of care.
CONCLUSION AND LESSONS LEARNED
While SMGL's health systems strengthening approach aimed to reduce challenges related to the 3 delays, participants still reported significant barriers accessing maternal and newborn health care. More research is needed to understand the necessary intervention package to affect system-wide change.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30867214
pii: GHSP-D-18-00287
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00287
pmc: PMC6519671
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S139-S150

Informations de copyright

© Ngoma-Hazemba et al.

Références

Reprod Health Matters. 2003 May;11(21):16-26
pubmed: 12800700
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jul;12(4):519-24
pubmed: 17713849
BMC Public Health. 2007 Dec 18;7:352
pubmed: 18088437
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Mar 04;9:10
pubmed: 19261181
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34
pubmed: 19671156
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):782-3
pubmed: 19700190
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Aug;15(8):964-72
pubmed: 20636527
Reprod Health. 2010 Nov 05;7:30
pubmed: 21054870
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Jan 30;11:11
pubmed: 21276263
Reprod Health. 2011 Nov 16;8:33
pubmed: 22087791
Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):155-63
pubmed: 22789093
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e49938
pubmed: 23236357
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52090
pubmed: 23284882
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jul 04;13:141
pubmed: 23826935
Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Mar;17(1):15-26
pubmed: 24069731
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Nov 11;13:205
pubmed: 24215446
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Jan 18;17 Suppl 1:4
pubmed: 24643142
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):1058-66
pubmed: 24889956
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Mar 21;1(1):117-33
pubmed: 25276522
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jan;56(1 Suppl):S7-14
pubmed: 25528980
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Jan 14;4(2):99-106
pubmed: 25674573
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):46-55
pubmed: 25862731
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 20;15:333
pubmed: 26290436
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74
pubmed: 26584737
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 23;15:306
pubmed: 26596353
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 27;16:21
pubmed: 26819242
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161221
pubmed: 27532665
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):300
pubmed: 27724846
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Dec 7;9(1):504
pubmed: 27927217
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):42
pubmed: 28103836
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):151-154
pubmed: 28371115
Reprod Health. 2017 May 30;14(1):68
pubmed: 28558800
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 12;17(1):219
pubmed: 28697794
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):269
pubmed: 28854880
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):288
pubmed: 28877675
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194535
pubmed: 29543884
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
pubmed: 8042057

Auteurs

Alice Ngoma-Hazemba (A)

Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. alicengomah@gmail.com.

Leoda Hamomba (L)

Division of Global HIV and TB, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.

Adam Silumbwe (A)

Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Margarate Nzala Munakampe (MN)

Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Fatma Soud (F)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia. Now an independent consultant, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH