Macroscopic locoregional relapse from prostate cancer: which role for salvage radiotherapy?
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Androgen Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Combined Modality Therapy
/ methods
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ blood
Positron-Emission Tomography
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Radiotherapy Dosage
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
/ methods
Survival Analysis
Hormone therapy
Macroscopic relapse
Prostate cancer
Salvage radiotherapy
Toxicities
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
24
01
2019
accepted:
07
03
2019
pubmed:
15
3
2019
medline:
27
12
2019
entrez:
15
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) is recommended as soon as PSA rises above 0.20 ng/ml, but many patients (pts) still experience local macroscopic relapse. The aim of this multicentric retrospective analysis was to evaluate the role of SRT in pts with macroscopic relapse. From 2001 to 2016, 105 consecutive pts with macroscopic PCa relapse underwent SRT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Mean age was 72 years. At time of relapse, 29 pts had a PSA value < 1.0 ng/mL, 50 from 1.1 to 5, and 25 pts > 5. Before SRT, 23 pts had undergone 18F-choline PET and 15 pts pelvic MRI. Ninety-four pts had prostatic bed relapse only, and four nodal involvement. Fifty-one pts were previously submitted to first-line ADT, while 6 pts received ≥ 2 lines. At a median follow-up of 52 months, 89 pts were alive, while 16 were dead. Total RT dose to macroscopic lesions was > 70 Gy in 58 pts, 66-70 Gy in 43, and < 66 Gy in 4 pts. In 72 pts, target volume encompassed only the prostatic bed with sequential boost to macroscopic site; 33 pts received prophylactic pelvic RT. Ten-year overall survival was 76.1%, while distant metastasis-free survival was 73.3%. No grade 4-5 toxicities were found. SRT ± ADT for macroscopic relapse showed a favorable oncological outcome supporting its important role in this scenario. Data from this series suggest that SRT may either postpone ADT or improve results over ADT alone in appropriately selected pts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30868389
doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02084-0
pii: 10.1007/s12094-019-02084-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1532-1537Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Cancer. 2011 Sep 1;117(17):3925-32
pubmed: 21437885
J Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;55(2):223-32
pubmed: 24434294
Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27
pubmed: 23084481
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Nov 27;8:276
pubmed: 24279376
Radiol Med. 2018 Jan;123(1):63-70
pubmed: 28924967
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):550-560
pubmed: 29133278
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-756
pubmed: 27160475
J Urol. 2002 Jan;167(1):117-22
pubmed: 11743287
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3864-3871
pubmed: 27480153
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 30;12(11):e0187794
pubmed: 29190707
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):417-428
pubmed: 28146658
Eur Radiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):1745-52
pubmed: 23377546
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1075-1081
pubmed: 29709664
Clin Prostate Cancer. 2004 Sep;3(2):93-7
pubmed: 15479492
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197252
pubmed: 29795595
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190479
pubmed: 29320570
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):156-165
pubmed: 28716370
In Vivo. 2018 Jan-Feb;32(1):125-131
pubmed: 29275309
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):7-11
pubmed: 27779202
Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):99-106
pubmed: 29128208
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):106-17
pubmed: 23628493