Use of Online or Paper Surveys by Australian Women: Longitudinal Study of Users, Devices, and Cohort Retention.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 03 2019
Historique:
received: 02 04 2018
accepted: 30 12 2018
revised: 10 12 2018
entrez: 15 3 2019
pubmed: 15 3 2019
medline: 11 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is increasing use of online surveys to improve data quality and timeliness and reduce costs. While there have been numerous cross-sectional studies comparing responses to online or paper surveys, there is little research from a longitudinal perspective. In the context of the well-established Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, we examined the patterns of responses to online or paper surveys across the first two waves of the study in which both modes were offered. We compared the following: differences between women born between 1946 and 1951 and between 1973 and 1978; types of device used for online completion; sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics of women who responded online or using mailed paper surveys; and associations between mode of completion in the first survey and participation and mode of completion in the second survey. Participants in this study, who had responded to regular mailed surveys since 1996, were offered a choice of completing surveys using paper questionnaires or Web-based electronic questionnaires starting in 2012. Two groups of women were involved: an older cohort born between 1946 and 1951 aged in their 60s and a younger cohort born between 1973 and 1978 aged in their 30s when the online surveys were first introduced. We compared women who responded online on both occasions, women who responded online at the first survey and used the paper version of the second survey, women who changed from paper to online, and those who used paper for both surveys. Of the 9663 women in their 60s who responded to one or both surveys, more than 50% preferred paper surveys (5290/9663, 54.74%, on the first survey and 5373/8621, 62.32%, on the second survey). If they chose the online version, most used computers. In contrast, of the 8628 women in their 30s, 56.04% (4835/8628) chose the online version at the first survey. While most favored computers to phones or tablets, many did try these alternatives on the subsequent survey. Many women who completed the survey online the first time preferred the paper version on the subsequent survey. In fact, for women in their 60s, the number who went from online to paper (1151/3851, 29.89%) exceeded the number who went from paper to online (734/5290, 13.88%). The online option was more likely to be chosen by better educated and healthier women. In both cohorts, women who completed paper surveys were more likely than online completers to become nonrespondents on the next survey. Due to the large sample size, almost all differences were statistically significant, with P<.001. Despite the cost-saving advantages of online compared to paper surveys, paper surveys are likely to appeal to a different population of potential respondents with different sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics and greater likelihood of attrition from the study. Not offering a paper version is therefore likely to induce bias in the distribution of responses unless weighting for respondent characteristics (relative to the target population) is employed. Therefore, if mixed mode (paper or online) options are feasible, they are highly likely to produce more representative results than if only the less costly online option is offered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is increasing use of online surveys to improve data quality and timeliness and reduce costs. While there have been numerous cross-sectional studies comparing responses to online or paper surveys, there is little research from a longitudinal perspective.
OBJECTIVE
In the context of the well-established Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, we examined the patterns of responses to online or paper surveys across the first two waves of the study in which both modes were offered. We compared the following: differences between women born between 1946 and 1951 and between 1973 and 1978; types of device used for online completion; sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics of women who responded online or using mailed paper surveys; and associations between mode of completion in the first survey and participation and mode of completion in the second survey.
METHODS
Participants in this study, who had responded to regular mailed surveys since 1996, were offered a choice of completing surveys using paper questionnaires or Web-based electronic questionnaires starting in 2012. Two groups of women were involved: an older cohort born between 1946 and 1951 aged in their 60s and a younger cohort born between 1973 and 1978 aged in their 30s when the online surveys were first introduced. We compared women who responded online on both occasions, women who responded online at the first survey and used the paper version of the second survey, women who changed from paper to online, and those who used paper for both surveys.
RESULTS
Of the 9663 women in their 60s who responded to one or both surveys, more than 50% preferred paper surveys (5290/9663, 54.74%, on the first survey and 5373/8621, 62.32%, on the second survey). If they chose the online version, most used computers. In contrast, of the 8628 women in their 30s, 56.04% (4835/8628) chose the online version at the first survey. While most favored computers to phones or tablets, many did try these alternatives on the subsequent survey. Many women who completed the survey online the first time preferred the paper version on the subsequent survey. In fact, for women in their 60s, the number who went from online to paper (1151/3851, 29.89%) exceeded the number who went from paper to online (734/5290, 13.88%). The online option was more likely to be chosen by better educated and healthier women. In both cohorts, women who completed paper surveys were more likely than online completers to become nonrespondents on the next survey. Due to the large sample size, almost all differences were statistically significant, with P<.001.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the cost-saving advantages of online compared to paper surveys, paper surveys are likely to appeal to a different population of potential respondents with different sociodemographic, behavioral, and health characteristics and greater likelihood of attrition from the study. Not offering a paper version is therefore likely to induce bias in the distribution of responses unless weighting for respondent characteristics (relative to the target population) is employed. Therefore, if mixed mode (paper or online) options are feasible, they are highly likely to produce more representative results than if only the less costly online option is offered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30869647
pii: v21i3e10672
doi: 10.2196/10672
pmc: PMC6437619
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e10672

Informations de copyright

©David Fitzgerald, Richard Hockey, Mark Jones, Gita Mishra, Michael Waller, Annette Dobson. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.03.2019.

Références

J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 31;16(10):e239
pubmed: 25364951
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2017 Mar 21;14:4
pubmed: 28344629
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):e24
pubmed: 29362206
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 22;18(3):e70
pubmed: 27005707
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Oct 21;12(4):e46
pubmed: 20965873
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 14;9(10):e108441
pubmed: 25313672
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e25
pubmed: 17942387
Public Opin Q. 2000 Winter;64(4):464-94
pubmed: 11171027
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-8
pubmed: 20880962
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 26;15(8):e173
pubmed: 23978658
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;20(4):318-21
pubmed: 20149968
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;58(4):425-9
pubmed: 15862729
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:116-125
pubmed: 28844786
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec 1;166(11):1345-54
pubmed: 17728269
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 07;17(5):e111
pubmed: 25953059
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;44(5):1547,1547a-1547f
pubmed: 26130741
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;34(5):987-91
pubmed: 15894591

Auteurs

David Fitzgerald (D)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Richard Hockey (R)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Mark Jones (M)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Gita Mishra (G)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Michael Waller (M)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Annette Dobson (A)

Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH