Quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict spontaneous preterm delivery after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 03 2019
14 03 2019
Historique:
received:
06
04
2018
accepted:
01
03
2019
entrez:
16
3
2019
pubmed:
16
3
2019
medline:
29
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Our goal was to assess whether quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) is associated with spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). qfFN was collected within 24 hours before and after laser surgery. Aims were: (1) To determine if qfFN changed with operative fetoscopy; and (2) To estimate the number of patients needed to study the predictive value of qfFN for sPTB <28 and <32 weeks. Results are reported as median (range). Among 49 patients, there was no net difference in qfFN levels after laser surgery [0.0 ng/mL (-37 to +400), p = 0.6041]. However, patients with a qfFN increase >10 ng/mL were 19 times more likely to undergo sPTB at <28 weeks (OR = 19.5). We determined that 383 and 160 patients would be needed to achieve adequate statistical power for qfFN to be predictive of sPTB at a GA <28 weeks and <32 weeks, respectively. In conclusion, laser surgery did not alter the qfFN level within the entire cohort, but qfFN may be useful in identifying a subset of patients at increased risk of preterm delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30872799
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41163-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-41163-8
pmc: PMC6418228
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fibronectins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4438Références
J Perinat Med. 2017 Jan 1;45(1):91-98
pubmed: 27049613
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jan;33(2):208-13
pubmed: 26368914
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):607-611
pubmed: 27153404
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct;31(19):2564-2568
pubmed: 28651447
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):73-81
pubmed: 25251479
J Ultrasound Med. 2009 May;28(5):633-9
pubmed: 19389902
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):13-8
pubmed: 9240576
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;49(5):612-616
pubmed: 27222097
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Mar;31(6):726-734
pubmed: 28274163
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84
pubmed: 18177778
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):359-362
pubmed: 29374983
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):393.e1-6
pubmed: 21411051
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jun;34(6):977-84
pubmed: 26014316
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;109(5):1083-7
pubmed: 17470586
Am J Pathol. 1991 Mar;138(3):537-43
pubmed: 2000933
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):313.e1-5
pubmed: 19733285
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(1):29-34
pubmed: 25427832
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;45(2):175-82
pubmed: 25319967
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Oct;20(10):763-8
pubmed: 17763279
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2160
pubmed: 29391455
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 1;5(4):179
pubmed: 10838333
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1183-1191
pubmed: 29112664
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):122.e1-6
pubmed: 23164760
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;209(3):264.e1-8
pubmed: 23747839
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Jun;36(6):399-402
pubmed: 17597963
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 8;351(2):136-44
pubmed: 15238624
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1110-6
pubmed: 16157121
J Perinatol. 1999 Dec;19(8 Pt 1):550-5
pubmed: 10645517