Has adherence to treatment guidelines for mid/low rectal cancer affected the management of patients? A monocentric study of 604 consecutive patients.
Aged
Anal Canal
Female
France
Guideline Adherence
/ standards
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ standards
Male
Organ Sparing Treatments
/ standards
Patient Care Team
/ organization & administration
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Quality Improvement
Quality of Health Care
Rectal Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Sex Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ standards
Treatment Outcome
Multidisciplinary management
Recommendations for clinical practice
Rectal cancer
Recurrence
Surgery
Survival
Journal
Journal of visceral surgery
ISSN: 1878-7886
Titre abrégé: J Visc Surg
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101532664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In 2006 under the supervision of the French health authorities (HAS), recommendations for clinical practice (RCP) in the management of rectal cancers were first published. The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of these guidelines on multidisciplinary management in terms of therapeutic strategies based on disease staging and quality indicators for surgical excision. Secondarily, we assessed the impact of the RCPs on postoperative and oncological outcomes. All consecutive patients having undergone curative surgical excision for middle and low (subperitoneal) rectal cancer from 1995 to 2017 in the university hospital of Caen were included in accordance with the relevant French guidelines. They were divided into two groups: before (Gr1) and after (Gr2) 2006. For each group, a chart review was conducted on demographic variables, preoperative rectal tumor features, disease severity variables and quality of surgery variables. Postoperative and oncological outcomes were likewise assessed and compared between the two groups. Six hundred and four patients were included (Gr1, n=266; Gr2, n=338). Compliance with French guidelines significantly improved (i) use of magnetic resonance imaging (P<0.0001) and CT-scan (P<0.0001)]; (ii) organization of multidisciplinary tumor boards (P<0.0001) leading to suitable neo-adjuvant treatment plan classification (P<0.0001). Consequently, compliance improved widespread total mesorectal excision (P<0.0001), sphincter-sparing surgery (P=0,0005), and completeness of curative resection in the specimen (P<0.0001). Although postoperative 90-day mortality was similar, overall postoperative morbidity significantly increased in Gr2 (P<0.0001). Overall (P=0.0005) and disease-free survival (P=0.0016) of patients in Gr2 were significantly prolonged and correlated with a significant reduction in local and distant recurrences. Compliance with the relevant French guidelines improved the quality of multidisciplinary management of patients undergoing curative surgery for subperitoneal rectal cancer. However, further progress is still needed to render accession to the recommendations more comprehensive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30876923
pii: S1878-7886(19)30001-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.01.001
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
281-290Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.