Comparative Risk of Serious Infections With Biologic and/or Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 08 11 2018
revised: 29 01 2019
accepted: 17 02 2019
pubmed: 17 3 2019
medline: 28 5 2021
entrez: 17 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative risk of serious infections with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, non-TNF targeted biologics, tofacitinib, and immunosuppressive agents in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). In a systematic search of publications, through March 18, 2018, we identified 15 observational studies (>500 person-years) of patients with IBD treated with TNF antagonists, non-TNF targeted biologics, tofacitinib, and/or immunosuppressive agents (thiopurines, methotrexate) that reported risk of serious infections. Only studies with active comparators were included, to allow appropriate comparative synthesis. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs. Compared with anti-TNF monotherapy, risk of serious infection increased with the combination of anti-TNF and an immunosuppressive agent (in 6 cohorts: RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37), with anti-TNF and a corticosteroid (in 4 cohorts: RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03), or with all 3 drugs (in 2 cohorts: RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77); there was minimal heterogeneity among studies. In contrast, monotherapy with an immunosuppressive agent was associated with a lower risk of serious infections than monotherapy with a TNF antagonist (7 cohorts: RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.84) or a TNF antagonist with an immunosuppressive agent (2 cohorts: RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81). Infliximab-based therapy was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with adalimumab-based therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (4 cohorts: RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97), but not Crohn's disease (4 cohorts: RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.70). Few data were available on the comparative safety of biologic agents that do not inhibit TNF and tofacitinib. Combination therapies for IBD that include TNF antagonists, especially with corticosteroids, are associated with a higher risk of serious infection, whereas monotherapy with an immunosuppressive agent is associated with a lower risk, compared with monotherapy with a TNF antagonist. Studies are needed to evaluate the comparative safety of non-TNF targeted biologics and small molecules for treatment of IBD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative risk of serious infections with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, non-TNF targeted biologics, tofacitinib, and immunosuppressive agents in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).
METHODS
In a systematic search of publications, through March 18, 2018, we identified 15 observational studies (>500 person-years) of patients with IBD treated with TNF antagonists, non-TNF targeted biologics, tofacitinib, and/or immunosuppressive agents (thiopurines, methotrexate) that reported risk of serious infections. Only studies with active comparators were included, to allow appropriate comparative synthesis. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs.
RESULTS
Compared with anti-TNF monotherapy, risk of serious infection increased with the combination of anti-TNF and an immunosuppressive agent (in 6 cohorts: RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37), with anti-TNF and a corticosteroid (in 4 cohorts: RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03), or with all 3 drugs (in 2 cohorts: RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77); there was minimal heterogeneity among studies. In contrast, monotherapy with an immunosuppressive agent was associated with a lower risk of serious infections than monotherapy with a TNF antagonist (7 cohorts: RR, 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.84) or a TNF antagonist with an immunosuppressive agent (2 cohorts: RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81). Infliximab-based therapy was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with adalimumab-based therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (4 cohorts: RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97), but not Crohn's disease (4 cohorts: RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.49-1.70). Few data were available on the comparative safety of biologic agents that do not inhibit TNF and tofacitinib.
CONCLUSIONS
Combination therapies for IBD that include TNF antagonists, especially with corticosteroids, are associated with a higher risk of serious infection, whereas monotherapy with an immunosuppressive agent is associated with a lower risk, compared with monotherapy with a TNF antagonist. Studies are needed to evaluate the comparative safety of non-TNF targeted biologics and small molecules for treatment of IBD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30876964
pii: S1542-3565(19)30255-1
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.044
pmc: PMC8011651
mid: NIHMS1680859
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biological Products 0
Immunosuppressive Agents 0
Piperidines 0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
Pyrimidines 0
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha 0
tofacitinib 87LA6FU830

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

69-81.e3

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K23 DK117058
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Jun 1;11(6):680-689
pubmed: 28025307
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0155218
pubmed: 27214202
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;113(6):872-882
pubmed: 29867173
Gastroenterology. 2014 Mar;146(3):681-688.e1
pubmed: 24269926
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1825-34
pubmed: 26342731
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 23;11(6):e0158017
pubmed: 27336296
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Sep;10(9):1033-41
pubmed: 26961546
BMJ. 2015 Jun 05;350:h2809
pubmed: 26048617
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;17(8):1533-1540.e2
pubmed: 30268561
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1806-1815
pubmed: 27670599
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;15(8):1218-1225.e7
pubmed: 27913244
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Oct;102(4):633-641
pubmed: 28699217
Gut. 2009 Apr;58(4):501-8
pubmed: 18832524
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 May;43(9):994-1003
pubmed: 26991059
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;107(9):1409-22
pubmed: 22890223
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 15;362(15):1383-95
pubmed: 20393175
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
BMJ. 2015 Sep 16;351:h4718
pubmed: 26377337
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jan;47(2):162-175
pubmed: 29205406
Gastroenterology. 2014 Feb;146(2):392-400.e3
pubmed: 24512909
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Oct;46(10):881-6
pubmed: 25081843
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;14(10):1385-1397.e10
pubmed: 27189910
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Mar 19;24(4):916-923
pubmed: 29562273
Gut. 2017 May;66(5):839-851
pubmed: 26893500
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Aug;16(8):1284-1292.e30
pubmed: 29474966
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Nov;25(11):1732-8
pubmed: 21039834
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Nov;10(11):1259-1266
pubmed: 27566367
Gastroenterology. 2018 Aug;155(2):337-346.e10
pubmed: 29655835
JAMA. 2011 Dec 7;306(21):2331-9
pubmed: 22056398
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug;14(8):1120-1129.e6
pubmed: 27058635
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 05;10:203-213
pubmed: 29440933
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;17(3):370-379
pubmed: 30031174
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;113(3):405-417
pubmed: 29336432
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;108(12):1835-42, quiz 1843
pubmed: 24042192
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-6
pubmed: 23420236
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;48(4):394-409
pubmed: 29920733
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;47(5):596-604
pubmed: 29239001
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;30(3):253-64
pubmed: 19438424
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Siddharth Singh (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: sis040@ucsd.edu.

Antonio Facciorusso (A)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Parambir S Dulai (PS)

Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Vipul Jairath (V)

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Ontario, Canada; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

William J Sandborn (WJ)

Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH