Canine models of human amelogenesis imperfecta: identification of novel recessive ENAM and ACP4 variants.
Journal
Human genetics
ISSN: 1432-1203
Titre abrégé: Hum Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7613873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
07
01
2019
accepted:
05
03
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
6
6
2019
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) refers to a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of inherited disorders affecting the structure, composition, and quantity of tooth enamel. Both non-syndromic and syndromic forms of AI have been described and several genes affecting various aspects of the enamel physiology have been reported. Genetically modified murine models of various genes have provided insights into the complex regulation of proper amelogenesis. Non-syndromic AI occurs spontaneously also in dogs with known recessive variants in ENAM and SLC24A4 genes. Unlike rodents with a reduced dentition and continuously erupting incisors, canine models are valuable for human AI due to similarity in the dental anatomy including deciduous and permanent teeth. We have performed a series of clinical and genetic analyses to investigate AI in several breeds of dogs and describe here two novel recessive variants in the ENAM and ACP4 genes. A fully segregating missense variant (c.716C>T) in exon 8 of ENAM substitutes a well-conserved proline to leucine, p.(Pro239Leu), resulting in a clinical hypomineralization of teeth. A 1-bp insertion in ACP4 (c.1189dupG) is predicted to lead to a frameshift, p.(Ala397Glyfs), resulting in an abnormal C-terminal part of the protein, and hypoplastic AI. The ENAM variant was specific for Parson Russell Terriers with a carrier frequency of 9%. The ACP4 variant was found in two breeds, Akita and American Akita with a carrier frequency of 22%. These genetic findings establish novel canine models of human AI with a particular interest in the case of the ACP4-deficient model, since ACP4 physiology is poorly characterized in human AI. The affected dogs could also serve as preclinical models for novel treatments while the breeds would benefit from genetic tests devised here for veterinary diagnostics and breeding programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30877375
doi: 10.1007/s00439-019-01997-8
pii: 10.1007/s00439-019-01997-8
pmc: PMC6536466
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Enamel Proteins
0
tuftelin
0
Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
525-533Références
Eur J Oral Sci. 2000 Oct;108(5):353-8
pubmed: 11037750
J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 24;276(34):31871-5
pubmed: 11406633
Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Aug 1;10(16):1673-7
pubmed: 11487571
Hum Mol Genet. 2002 May 1;11(9):1069-74
pubmed: 11978766
J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 20;277(51):49598-604
pubmed: 12393861
Oral Dis. 2003 Jan;9(1):19-23
pubmed: 12617253
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003;14(6):387-98
pubmed: 14656895
J Med Genet. 2003 Dec;40(12):900-6
pubmed: 14684688
J Dent Res. 2004 May;83(5):378-83
pubmed: 15111628
J Dent Res. 2005 Nov;84(11):1036-41
pubmed: 16246937
J Dent Res. 2005 Dec;84(12):1117-26
pubmed: 16304440
Bioinformatics. 2007 May 15;23(10):1289-91
pubmed: 17379693
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):489-94
pubmed: 18252228
J Biol Chem. 2008 Apr 18;283(16):10858-71
pubmed: 18252720
Biol Chem. 2008 Jun;389(6):695-700
pubmed: 18627287
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Nat Methods. 2010 Apr;7(4):248-9
pubmed: 20354512
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(16):e164
pubmed: 20601685
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 May 13;88(5):616-20
pubmed: 21549343
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35200
pubmed: 22539960
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Aug;40(15):e115
pubmed: 22730293
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46688
pubmed: 23056405
Anim Genet. 2013 Aug;44(5):569-78
pubmed: 23638899
Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58(2):133-40; quiz 266
pubmed: 23713631
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 06;(6):CD007157
pubmed: 23744349
J Dent. 2013 Aug;41(8):689-94
pubmed: 23778130
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 May 1;23(9):2468-80
pubmed: 24362885
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 06;9(3):e89303
pubmed: 24603688
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 07;4:5597
pubmed: 24998260
J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):52-61
pubmed: 25389004
Bioinformatics. 2015 Aug 15;31(16):2745-7
pubmed: 25851949
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 03;5:12810
pubmed: 26235384
Cell Tissue Res. 2016 Apr;364(1):95-103
pubmed: 26547858
Nat Methods. 2016 Jan;13(1):63-5
pubmed: 26550772
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov 3;99(5):1199-1205
pubmed: 27843125
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 May 5;45(8):e57
pubmed: 28053114
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug;25(8):1015-1019
pubmed: 28513613
Front Physiol. 2017 Jun 26;8:435
pubmed: 28694781
Canine Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 22;4:11
pubmed: 29201383
J Dent Res. 2018 Jul;97(7):820-827
pubmed: 29481294
J Oral Pathol. 1988 Nov;17(9-10):547-53
pubmed: 3150442
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1986 Feb;14(1):43-7
pubmed: 3456873
Hum Mutat. 1995;5(3):251-9
pubmed: 7599636
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Oct;53(4):257-61
pubmed: 8275354
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1998;9(2):128-61
pubmed: 9603233