Interactive effects between donor and recipient species mediate fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt in a co-flowering community.
Co-flowering
Pollen size
Pollen transfer
Pollination
Stigma area
Journal
Oecologia
ISSN: 1432-1939
Titre abrégé: Oecologia
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0150372
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
05
10
2018
accepted:
04
03
2019
pubmed:
17
3
2019
medline:
24
9
2019
entrez:
17
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluation of pollen transfer in wild plant communities revealing heterospecific pollen receipt is common, yet experimental hand pollinations have revealed high among-species variation in the magnitude of its effect on recipient fitness. The causes of this among-species variation are unknown, however, prompting the investigation of underlying factors. Here, we conducted a hand-pollination experiment with ten co-flowering species to determine whether the effects of heterospecific pollen receipt are mediated by the pollen donor or recipient species alone, or whether the effects are determined by the interaction between them. We further assessed species traits potentially mediating interactive effects in heterospecific pollen receipt by evaluating the relationship between heterospecific pollen effect size and three different predictors reflecting a unique combination of pollen donor and recipient characteristics. Our results show, for the first time, that the magnitude of the heterospecific pollen receipt effect is determined by the specific combination of donor and recipient species (i.e., interactive effects). However, we were unable to uncover the specific combination of traits mediating these effects. Overall, our study provides strong evidence that an understanding of heterospecific pollen receipt effects based on recipient or donor characteristics alone may be insufficient. This study is an important step toward an understanding of consequences of heterospecific pollen receipt in co-flowering communities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30877578
doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04379-z
pii: 10.1007/s00442-019-04379-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1041-1047Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DEB1452386
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 9;98(21):11919-24
pubmed: 11559840
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383-7
pubmed: 12881488
Am Nat. 2005 Sep;166(3):330-8
pubmed: 16224688
Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2425-32
pubmed: 17089651
Ecol Lett. 2007 Jul;10(7):539-50
pubmed: 17542933
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19891-6
pubmed: 18056808
Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2098-100
pubmed: 18678590
New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):286-317
pubmed: 19086285
Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):431-40
pubmed: 20392008
New Phytol. 2011 Nov;192(3):738-46
pubmed: 21777248
Am J Bot. 2013 Jun;100(6):1061-70
pubmed: 23624924
Ecology. 2013 May;94(5):1176-85
pubmed: 23858657
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):4916-21
pubmed: 24639544
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):514-21
pubmed: 26451033
Am J Bot. 2016 Mar;103(3):396-407
pubmed: 26507115
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 03;10(12):e0143532
pubmed: 26633170
Ecol Lett. 2016 May;19(5):576-86
pubmed: 26991916
Oecologia. 1991 Mar;86(1):99-104
pubmed: 28313164
Evolution. 1981 Sep;35(5):964-974
pubmed: 28581057
Am J Bot. 2018 May;105(5):836-841
pubmed: 29799624
New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):142-154
pubmed: 30084201