Prediction of brace effect in scoliotic patients: blinded evaluation of a novel brace simulator-an observational cross-sectional study.
Avatar
Brace
Brace simulator
Patient specific
Scoliosis
Journal
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
ISSN: 1432-0932
Titre abrégé: Eur Spine J
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9301980
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
accepted:
08
03
2019
revised:
08
02
2019
pubmed:
18
3
2019
medline:
1
7
2020
entrez:
18
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bracing is the most commonly used treatment for scoliosis. But braces remain predominantly "handcrafted." Our objective was to create a novel brace simulator using a high-fidelity 3D "avatar" of the patient's trunk. An observational cross-sectional study was constructed. The inclusion criteria were patients with a moderate idiopathic scoliosis (between 15° and 35° of Cobb angle) aged between 9 and 15 years old with an indication of brace treatment. Twenty-nine scoliotic patients, 25 girls and four boys, with a mean age of 12.4 years were included. Twenty right thoracic and 14 left lumbar were measured with a mean Cobb angle of 24°. 3D "avatars" were generated using a novel technology called the "anatomy transfer." Biomedical simulations were conducted by engineers who were blinded to the clinical effect of the real patient brace. The in-brace Cobb angle effect (real effect) was compared with the virtual numeric in-brace Cobb angle observed using the blindly constructed avatar (simulation effect). Real and simulated in-brace Cobb angle were compared using a paired two-sided Student's t test. The real mean Cobb angle was 11° and 17° in the simulation which was statistically significant. The strength of prediction of the simulation was assessed for each individual patient; 76% of the real in-brace Cobb angles had good and moderate prediction (± 10°). Incorporating high-fidelity copy of the entire 3D shape of the patient's trunk and multiple 3D-reconstructed bony images into an anatomical reference avatar resulted in moderate-to-good prediction of brace effect in three quarters of patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30879183
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05948-9
pii: 10.1007/s00586-019-05948-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1277-1285Références
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;123:255-60
pubmed: 17108436
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007 May;45(5):467-73
pubmed: 17370098
Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1527-37
pubmed: 18456103
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jul;19(7):1169-78
pubmed: 20094736
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):E940-7
pubmed: 20431434
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Jul;49(7):743-53
pubmed: 21287287
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1706-13
pubmed: 21330954
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Aug;49(8):967-77
pubmed: 21728065
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Dec;27(10):999-1005
pubmed: 22989479
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2427-32
pubmed: 23760569
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2449-55
pubmed: 23812685
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1512-21
pubmed: 24047455
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014 Jan;11(1):1-3
pubmed: 24251596
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):681
pubmed: 24521128
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015;18 Suppl 1:2076-7
pubmed: 26236965
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 18;97(22):1899-903
pubmed: 26582623
Eur Spine J. 2016 Oct;25(10):3049-3055
pubmed: 26968874
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jun 1;42(11):823-830
pubmed: 27779608
Spine Deform. 2014 Jul;2(4):276-284
pubmed: 27927348
Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):253-260
pubmed: 27927513
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):275-278
pubmed: 28025152
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 2;8(1):16296
pubmed: 30389972
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Jan;63:63-71
pubmed: 30467027
Eur Spine J. 2019 Mar;28(3):551-558
pubmed: 30483962