Complications of augmentation procedures for dental implants in private practice, Victoria, Australia.
Augmentation
complication
dental implant
dentoalveolar
graft
Journal
Australian dental journal
ISSN: 1834-7819
Titre abrégé: Aust Dent J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 0370612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
accepted:
11
03
2019
pubmed:
19
3
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
entrez:
19
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study audited complications associated with augmentation for dental implants, retrospectively over a 5-year period in a variety of private dental practices in Victoria (Australia). Complications were categorized as surgical or biological and compared to a group not requiring augmentation. Implant factors underwent univariate and multivariate analysis. The study assessed 8486 implants with 26.9% undergoing augmentation. Augmentation had no effect on implant survival, however, a significant increase in complications for those implants requiring augmentation was found (P = <0.001). The hard tissue augmented group had significantly more cases of insufficient bone/dehiscences at implant placement (P < 0.001), and post-placement bone loss (P = 0.0014). These implants were grafted simultaneously (P < 0.05) with particulate autogenous bone and/or Bio-Oss (P < 0.05) with resorbable xenograft membrane (P < 0.001). There was significantly more bone loss in open sinus lifted cases than implants placed in native bone (1.90% v 0.30%; P = 0.009). The study demonstrated no increase in graft complications that could be related to any specific augmentation technique, suggesting that routine grafting procedures used in private practice were safe and appropriate. Previously augmented sites were found to be more likely to require further augmentation at implant placement.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223-228Informations de copyright
© 2019 Australian Dental Association.
Références
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009;2:167-184.
Clementini M, Morlupi A, Agrestini C, Barlattani A. Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:643-650.
Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
Hämmerle CH, Araújo MG, Simion M. On Behalf of the Osteology Consensus Group 2011: evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(Suppl. 5):80-82.
Esposito M, Maghaireh H, Grusovin MG, Ziounas I, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(2):CD006697.
Orsini M, Orsini G, Benlloch D, Aranda JJ, Lázaro P, Sanz M. Esthetic and dimensional evaluation of free connective tissue grafts in prosthetically treated patients: a 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol 2004;75:470-477.
Austin S, Bailey D, Chandu A, Dastaran M, Judge R. An analysis of commonly reported medical conditions amongst patients receiving dental implants in private practice. Aust Dent J 2014;60:343-352.
Meraw SJ, Eckert SE, Yacyshyn CE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of grafting techniques utilized in conjunction with endosseous implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:744-747.
Tonetti MS, Hämmerle CH; European Workshop on Periodontology Group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(Suppl. 8):168-172.
Galindo-Moreno P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Avila-Ortiz G, Silvestre FJ, Hernández-Cortés P, Wang HL. Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:378-384.
Lee HW, Lin WS, Morton D. A retrospective study of complications associated with 100 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations via the lateral window approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:860-868.
Becktor JP, Hallström H, Isaksson S, Sennerby L. The use of particulate bone grafts from the mandible for maxillary sinus floor augmentation before placement of surface-modified implants: results from bone grafting to delivery of the final fixed prosthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:780-786.
Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(SUPPL):237-259.
Kaing L, Grubor D, Chandu A. Assessment of bone grafts placed within an oral and maxillofacial training programme for implant rehabilitation. Aust Dent J 2011;56:406-411.
Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):218-236.
Katranji A, Fotek P, Wang HL. Sinus augmentation complications: aetiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008;17:339-349.
Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M. Vertical bone augmentation wit dental implant placement: efficacy and complications associated with two different techniques. A retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:600-606.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:696-710.
Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD008397.
Rakhmatia YD, Ayukawa Y, Furuhashi A, Koyano K. Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications. J Prosthodont Res 2013;57:3-14.
Antoun H, Sitbon JM, Martinez H, Missika P. A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:632-639.
Khojasteh A, Soheilifar S, Mohajerani H, Nowzari H. The effectiveness of barrier membranes on bone regeneration in localized bony defects: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1076-1089.
Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:173-202.
Smith LP, Ng M, Grubor D, Chandu A. Outcomes of dental implants placed during a surgical training programme. Aust Dent J 2009;54:361-367.
Shirota T, Ohno K, Michi KI, Tachikawa T. An experimental study of healing around hydroxylapatite implants installed with autogenous iliac bone grafts for jaw reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:1310-1315.
Nystrom E, Kahnberg K-E, Albrektsson T. Treatment of the severely resorbed maxillae with bone graft and titanium implants: histologic review of autopsy specimens. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:167-172.
Zitzmann NU, Schärer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:355-366.
Vermeeren JI, Wismeijer D, van Waas MA. One-step reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible with onlay bone grafts and endosteal implants. A 5-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:112-115.
Nyström E, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, Kahnberg KE. 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:258-262.
Rapani M, Rapani C. Sinus floor lift and simultaneous implant placement: a retrospective evaluation of implant success rate. Indian J Dent 2012;3:132-138.
Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with non-vascularised autogenous block bone: clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2039-2046.
Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(Suppl. 5):22-38.
Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:635-643.
Vittorini Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, de Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1049-1061.
Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):260-271.
Martin W, Lewis E, Nicol A. Local risk factors for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl):28-38.
Dastaran M, Bailey D, Chandu A, Austin S, Judge R. Retrospective assay of implant adjunctive procedures performed in private practice over 5-years in Victoria, Australia. Aust Dental J 2018.