Treatment outcomes for acute type A aortic dissection with patent false lumen in patients over the age of 80.
Acute type A aortic dissection
Patent false lumen
Patients aged over 80
Journal
General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1863-6713
Titre abrégé: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101303952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
28
03
2018
accepted:
04
03
2019
pubmed:
20
3
2019
medline:
9
1
2020
entrez:
20
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While reports which focus on the outcomes of conservative treatments for acute type A aortic dissection in patients over the age of 80 are worth considering, recently many studies have reported improved outcomes of surgical treatment. Accordingly, we analyzed the outcomes of surgical and conservative treatments for acute type A aortic dissection with patent false lumen in patients over the age of 80. We retrospectively investigated 70 patients over 80 years in age out of 248 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection between January, 2010, and May, 2015. Of the 70 patients, 44 underwent surgical treatments (ascending replacement in 33 and total arch replacement in 11) and 23 patients underwent conservative medical treatments. In the surgical treatment, the 30-day mortality rate was 14% (6/44) and the rate of morbidity was 34%. And 17 patients (39%) were discharged home without ambulatory assistance. The actuarial survival rates in the surgical treatment group were 83% and 60% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. The in-hospital death rate of conservative medical treatment was 43% (10/23). Only 26% of the patients having had conservative treatment were discharged home without ambulatory assistance. The actuarial survival rate in the conservative medical group was 8.7% at 1 year. Surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection with patent false lumen were satisfactory in patients aged over 80 in this study by meticulously determining operative indications, depending on the background of each patient.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30888589
doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01111-9
pii: 10.1007/s11748-019-01111-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
765-772Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Circulation. 2003 Mar 4;107(8):1158-63
pubmed: 12615795
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1874-8; discussion 1891-4
pubmed: 10391330
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Aug;82(2):554-9
pubmed: 16863762
Circulation. 1991 Nov;84(5 Suppl):III7-13
pubmed: 1934444
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;51(3):472-477
pubmed: 28364444
JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):897-903
pubmed: 10685714
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1058-63
pubmed: 21561787
Heart. 2004 Apr;90(4):368-71
pubmed: 15020502
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Aug 21;40(4):685-92
pubmed: 12204498
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 1;103(7):1029-31
pubmed: 19327436
Circ J. 2013;77(3):789-828
pubmed: 23412710
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Feb;121(2):259-67
pubmed: 11174731
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):733-5
pubmed: 16098446
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):585-90
pubmed: 15276527
Circulation. 2002 Jan 15;105(2):200-6
pubmed: 11790701
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S63-71
pubmed: 23266252
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jul;82(1):74-9
pubmed: 16798193
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):392-7
pubmed: 23764209
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 May;135(5):1042-6
pubmed: 18455582
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;145(3 Suppl):S186-90
pubmed: 23267524
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 May;135(5):984-5
pubmed: 18455572
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar;2(2):148-58
pubmed: 23977575
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):491-7
pubmed: 19632399
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jul;72(1):72-9
pubmed: 11465234
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):131-138
pubmed: 27460914
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 1;108(3):453-9
pubmed: 21600540
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):501-9
pubmed: 17258589