Validation of Polish version of the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care revised questionnaire.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
07
2018
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
21
3
2019
pubmed:
21
3
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Development of simple, valid and reliable instruments to determine nursing care rationing is a subject of ongoing research. One such instrument, which is gaining popularity worldwide and has significant research applicability, is the Basel Extent of Rationing of Nursing Care (BERNCA) and its revised version, the BERNCA-R. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the BERNCA-R into a Polish-language version and to assess its reliability and validity in evaluating the level of implicit rationing of nursing care in Poland. Standard methodological requirements were followed during translation and cultural adaptation of the English version of the BERNCA-R questionnaire into Polish. The cross-sectional validation study was conducted between May and September 2017, which included 175 nurses undergoing specialisation and qualification courses at the European Postgraduate Education Centre in Wrocław, Poland. Cronbach's alpha and inter-item correlations were used to analyse the internal consistency of the Polish BERNCA-R questionnaire. The mean total BERNCA-R score was 1.9 points (SD = 0.74) on a scale of 0-4. Cronbach's alpha for the unidimensional scale was 0.96. The mean inter-item correlation was 0.4 (range 0.1-0.84), which indicates high internal consistency. A single-factor solution demonstrated stable loadings above 0.5 for almost all items of the Polish BERNCA-R questionnaire. The study using the Polish BERNCA-R questionnaire demonstrated that the instrument is valid and reliable for use in investigating care rationing in groups of Polish nurses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30893382
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212918
pii: PONE-D-18-21700
pmc: PMC6426176
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0212918Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1474-1487
pubmed: 29517813
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):230-8
pubmed: 22457240
West J Nurs Res. 2013 Jul;35(6):760-94
pubmed: 23444060
Nurs Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;56(6):416-24
pubmed: 18004188
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:29-32
pubmed: 27125146
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Oct;48(2):175-86
pubmed: 15369498
BMC Nurs. 2016 Aug 02;15:46
pubmed: 27489507
Aust Crit Care. 2012 May;25(2):64-77
pubmed: 22515951
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2005 Aug;38(4):249-55
pubmed: 16133753
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 May;49(3):347-355
pubmed: 28388827
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Aug;20(4):227-37
pubmed: 18436556
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1524-1534
pubmed: 27325454
J Clin Nurs. 2000 Jan;9(1):25-35
pubmed: 11022489
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Feb 3;15(1):11
pubmed: 28159017
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):240-52
pubmed: 22560562
Int Nurs Rev. 2015 Jun;62(2):267-74
pubmed: 25762430
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Jul;46(7):884-93
pubmed: 19111306
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Aug;47(4):427-36
pubmed: 15271162
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):230-9
pubmed: 23084600
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Aug;21(5):583-93
pubmed: 24399832
Clin Nurs Res. 2014 Jun;23(3):314-35
pubmed: 23291314
J Nurs Care Qual. 2006 Oct-Dec;21(4):306-13; quiz 314-5
pubmed: 16985399
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Oct;66(10):2213-24
pubmed: 20626479