Variations in Blood Supply From Proximal to Distal in the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: A Qualitative Descriptive Cadaveric Study.
blood supply
distal
overhead athlete
proximal
ulnar collateral ligament
vascularity
Journal
The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
22
3
2019
medline:
1
4
2020
entrez:
22
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The vascular supply of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is unknown. Previous studies reported varying success in return-to-play rates after nonoperative management of partial UCL tears and suggested a varying healing capacity as possibly related to the location of the UCL injury. To analyze the macroscopic vascular anatomy of the UCL of the elbow. Descriptive laboratory study. Eighteen fresh-frozen male cadaveric elbows from 9 donors were sharply dissected 15 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle. Sixty milliliters of India ink was injected through the brachial artery of each elbow. Arms were then frozen at -10°C, radial side down, in 15° to 20° of elbow flexion. A band saw was used to section the frozen elbows into 5-mm coronal or sagittal sections. Sections were cleared for visualization with the modified Spalteholz technique. Images of the specimens were taken, and qualitative description of UCL vascularity was undertaken. The authors consistently found a dense blood supply to the proximal UCL, while the distal UCL was hypovascular. They also observed a possible osseous contribution to the proximal UCL from the medial epicondyle in addition to an artery from the flexor/pronator musculature that consistently appeared to provide vascularity to the proximal UCL. The degree of vascular penetration from proximal to distal in the UCL ranged from 39% to 68% of the overall UCL length, with a 49% mean length of vascular penetration of the UCL. This study found a difference in the vascular supply of the UCL. The proximal UCL was well vascularized, while the distal UCL was hypovascular. This difference in vascular supply may be a factor in the differential healing capacities of the UCL based on the location of injury. An improved understanding of the macroscopic vascular supply of the UCL may aid in the clinical management of partial UCL tears and suggests an indication for these treatments with respect to location of UCL injuries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The vascular supply of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is unknown. Previous studies reported varying success in return-to-play rates after nonoperative management of partial UCL tears and suggested a varying healing capacity as possibly related to the location of the UCL injury.
PURPOSE
To analyze the macroscopic vascular anatomy of the UCL of the elbow.
STUDY DESIGN
Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS
Eighteen fresh-frozen male cadaveric elbows from 9 donors were sharply dissected 15 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle. Sixty milliliters of India ink was injected through the brachial artery of each elbow. Arms were then frozen at -10°C, radial side down, in 15° to 20° of elbow flexion. A band saw was used to section the frozen elbows into 5-mm coronal or sagittal sections. Sections were cleared for visualization with the modified Spalteholz technique. Images of the specimens were taken, and qualitative description of UCL vascularity was undertaken.
RESULTS
The authors consistently found a dense blood supply to the proximal UCL, while the distal UCL was hypovascular. They also observed a possible osseous contribution to the proximal UCL from the medial epicondyle in addition to an artery from the flexor/pronator musculature that consistently appeared to provide vascularity to the proximal UCL. The degree of vascular penetration from proximal to distal in the UCL ranged from 39% to 68% of the overall UCL length, with a 49% mean length of vascular penetration of the UCL.
CONCLUSION
This study found a difference in the vascular supply of the UCL. The proximal UCL was well vascularized, while the distal UCL was hypovascular. This difference in vascular supply may be a factor in the differential healing capacities of the UCL based on the location of injury.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
An improved understanding of the macroscopic vascular supply of the UCL may aid in the clinical management of partial UCL tears and suggests an indication for these treatments with respect to location of UCL injuries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30896969
doi: 10.1177/0363546519831693
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM