Relative effects of location relative to the corpus luteum and lactation on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium.
Dairy cow
Lactation
Metabolism
Oviduct
RNAseq
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Mar 2019
21 Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
26
07
2018
accepted:
14
03
2019
entrez:
23
3
2019
pubmed:
23
3
2019
medline:
10
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lactation and associated metabolic stresses during the post-partum period have been shown to impair fertility in dairy cows. The oviduct plays key roles in embryo development and the establishment of pregnancy in cattle. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lactation and location relative to the corpus luteum (CL) on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium. An original animal model was used. At 60 days post-partum, Holstein lactating (n = 4) and non-lactating (i.e. never milked after calving; n = 5) cows, as well as control nulliparous heifers (n = 5), were slaughtered on Day 3 following induced estrus, and epithelial samples from the oviductal ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral and contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) were recovered for RNA sequencing. In the oviduct ipsilateral to the CL, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between heifers compared with both postpartum cow groups. However, only 15 DEGs were identified between post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows in the ipsilateral isthmus and none were identified in the ipsilateral ampulla. In contrast, 192 and 2583 DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral ampulla and isthmus, respectively. In both regions, more DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts in non-lactating cows and heifers than in lactating cows. Functional annotation of the DEGs associated with comparisons between metabolic groups highlighted a number of over-represented biological functions and cell pathways including immune response and cholesterol/steroid biosynthesis. Gene expression in the oviduct epithelium, particularly in the isthmus, was more affected by the location relative to the CL than by lactation at Day 3 post-estrus. Furthermore, the effect of the proximity to the CL was modulated by the metabolic status of the cow.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lactation and associated metabolic stresses during the post-partum period have been shown to impair fertility in dairy cows. The oviduct plays key roles in embryo development and the establishment of pregnancy in cattle. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of lactation and location relative to the corpus luteum (CL) on the transcriptome of the bovine oviduct epithelium.
RESULTS
RESULTS
An original animal model was used. At 60 days post-partum, Holstein lactating (n = 4) and non-lactating (i.e. never milked after calving; n = 5) cows, as well as control nulliparous heifers (n = 5), were slaughtered on Day 3 following induced estrus, and epithelial samples from the oviductal ampulla and isthmus ipsilateral and contralateral to the corpus luteum (CL) were recovered for RNA sequencing. In the oviduct ipsilateral to the CL, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between heifers compared with both postpartum cow groups. However, only 15 DEGs were identified between post-partum lactating and non-lactating cows in the ipsilateral isthmus and none were identified in the ipsilateral ampulla. In contrast, 192 and 2583 DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral ampulla and isthmus, respectively. In both regions, more DEGs were identified between ipsilateral and contralateral oviducts in non-lactating cows and heifers than in lactating cows. Functional annotation of the DEGs associated with comparisons between metabolic groups highlighted a number of over-represented biological functions and cell pathways including immune response and cholesterol/steroid biosynthesis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Gene expression in the oviduct epithelium, particularly in the isthmus, was more affected by the location relative to the CL than by lactation at Day 3 post-estrus. Furthermore, the effect of the proximity to the CL was modulated by the metabolic status of the cow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30898106
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5616-2
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5616-2
pmc: PMC6427878
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
233Subventions
Organisme : FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology
ID : 312097
Références
Theriogenology. 1998 Feb;49(3):607-18
pubmed: 10732039
Biol Reprod. 2003 Apr;68(4):1170-7
pubmed: 12606461
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 26;279(13):12763-8
pubmed: 14699127
Reproduction. 2005 Jan;129(1):9-18
pubmed: 15615894
Biol Reprod. 2006 Feb;74(2):253-64
pubmed: 16207835
Mol Reprod Dev. 2007 Apr;74(4):445-54
pubmed: 16998855
Theriogenology. 2007 Sep 1;68(4):538-48
pubmed: 17617447
Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Feb;75(2):291-8
pubmed: 17874454
Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Mar;75(3):496-503
pubmed: 17926343
Endocrinology. 2008 Mar;149(3):1268-76
pubmed: 18039777
Mol Reprod Dev. 2009 Mar;76(3):301-8
pubmed: 18671285
Theriogenology. 2009 Feb;71(3):450-7
pubmed: 18835636
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22(1):151-8
pubmed: 20003858
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1022-9
pubmed: 20172222
Biol Reprod. 2011 Feb;84(2):266-78
pubmed: 20881316
Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 Feb;123(3-4):127-38
pubmed: 21255947
Nat Protoc. 2012 Mar 01;7(3):562-78
pubmed: 22383036
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):3865-76
pubmed: 22720941
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5645-56
pubmed: 22863093
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5657-75
pubmed: 22884349
Bioinformatics. 2013 Mar 1;29(5):661-3
pubmed: 23325622
Reprod Domest Anim. 2010 Sep;45 Suppl 3:2-14
pubmed: 24417194
BMC Genomics. 2014 May 21;15:293
pubmed: 24886317
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 29;15:293
pubmed: 25176396
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016 Apr;28(6):673-81
pubmed: 25370848
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2015 Mar 10;:null
pubmed: 25751414
Biol Reprod. 2015 Jun;92(6):144
pubmed: 25926440
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016 Oct;28(12):1882-1892
pubmed: 26072962
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016 Oct;28(12):1926-1944
pubmed: 26085435
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Aug 05;13:84
pubmed: 26242217
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145321
pubmed: 26699362
Reproduction. 2016 Jun;151(6):577-87
pubmed: 26940101
Reproduction. 2016 Jul;152(1):37-46
pubmed: 27069007
Theriogenology. 2016 Jul 1;86(1):239-53
pubmed: 27238438
Theriogenology. 2016 Oct 1;86(6):1409-1420
pubmed: 27262884
Reproduction. 2016 Dec;152(6):629-644
pubmed: 27601716
J Endocrinol. 2017 Jan;232(1):R1-R26
pubmed: 27875265
Genom Data. 2017 Jun 15;13:27-29
pubmed: 28664146
Cell Tissue Res. 2017 Nov;370(2):319-333
pubmed: 28770380
Biol Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;97(3):413-425
pubmed: 29024972
Biol Reprod. 2017 Jan 1;97(6):798-809
pubmed: 29088315