Nucleic Acid Sensing in Mammals and Plants: Facts and Caveats.
Autoantibodies
Cytokines
DNA sensing
Damaged-self recognition
Danger signals
Inflammasome
Innate immunity
Interleukin
RNA sensing
Type I interferon
Journal
International review of cell and molecular biology
ISSN: 1937-6448
Titre abrégé: Int Rev Cell Mol Biol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101475846
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
25
3
2019
pubmed:
25
3
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The accumulation of nucleic acids in aberrant compartments is a signal of danger: fragments of cytosolic or extracellular self-DNA indicate cellular dysfunctions or disruption, whereas cytosolic fragments of nonself-DNA or RNA indicate infections. Therefore, nucleic acids trigger immunity in mammals and plants. In mammals, endosomal Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense single-stranded (ss) or double-stranded (ds) RNA or CpG-rich DNA, whereas various cytosolic receptors sense dsDNA. Although a self/nonself discrimination could favor targeted immune responses, no sequence-specific sensing of nucleic acids has been reported for mammals. Specific immune responses to extracellular self-DNA versus DNA from related species were recently reported for plants, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. The subcellular localization of mammalian receptors can favor self/nonself discrimination based on the localization of DNA fragments. However, autoantibodies and diverse damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) shuttle DNA through membranes, and most of the mammalian receptors share downstream signaling elements such as stimulator of interferon genes (STING) and the master transcription regulators, nuclear factor (NF)-κB, and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3). The resulting type I interferon (IFN) response stimulates innate immunity against multiple threats-from infection to physical injury or endogenous DNA damage-all of which lead to the accumulation of eDNA or cytoplasmatic dsDNA. Therefore, no or only low selective pressures might have favored a strict self/nonself discrimination in nucleic acid sensing. We conclude that the discrimination between self- and nonself-DNA is likely to be less strict-and less important-than assumed originally.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30904194
pii: S1937-6448(18)30111-4
doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2018.10.003
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alarmins
0
Inflammasomes
0
Nucleic Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
225-285Informations de copyright
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.