Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on preoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery.


Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 21 03 2018
revised: 18 12 2018
accepted: 01 01 2019
pubmed: 28 3 2019
medline: 23 4 2019
entrez: 28 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A multidisciplinary international working subgroup of the third Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus meeting appraised the evidence on the influence of preoperative arterial blood pressure and community cardiovascular medications on perioperative risk. A modified Delphi technique was used, evaluating papers published in MEDLINE on associations between preoperative numerical arterial pressure values or cardiovascular medications and perioperative outcomes. The strength of the recommendations was graded by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Significant heterogeneity in study design, including arterial pressure measures and perioperative outcomes, hampered the comparison of studies. Nonetheless, consensus recommendations were that (i) preoperative arterial pressure measures may be used to define targets for perioperative management; (ii) elective surgery should not be cancelled based solely upon a preoperative arterial pressure value; (iii) there is insufficient evidence to support lowering arterial pressure in the immediate preoperative period to minimise perioperative risk; and (iv) there is insufficient evidence that any one measure of arterial pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean, or pulse) is better than any other for risk prediction of adverse perioperative events. Future research should define which preoperative arterial pressure values best correlate with adverse outcomes, and whether modifying arterial pressure in the preoperative setting will change the perioperative morbidity or mortality. Additional research should define optimum strategies for continuation or discontinuation of preoperative cardiovascular medications.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A multidisciplinary international working subgroup of the third Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus meeting appraised the evidence on the influence of preoperative arterial blood pressure and community cardiovascular medications on perioperative risk.
METHODS METHODS
A modified Delphi technique was used, evaluating papers published in MEDLINE on associations between preoperative numerical arterial pressure values or cardiovascular medications and perioperative outcomes. The strength of the recommendations was graded by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines.
RESULTS RESULTS
Significant heterogeneity in study design, including arterial pressure measures and perioperative outcomes, hampered the comparison of studies. Nonetheless, consensus recommendations were that (i) preoperative arterial pressure measures may be used to define targets for perioperative management; (ii) elective surgery should not be cancelled based solely upon a preoperative arterial pressure value; (iii) there is insufficient evidence to support lowering arterial pressure in the immediate preoperative period to minimise perioperative risk; and (iv) there is insufficient evidence that any one measure of arterial pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean, or pulse) is better than any other for risk prediction of adverse perioperative events.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Future research should define which preoperative arterial pressure values best correlate with adverse outcomes, and whether modifying arterial pressure in the preoperative setting will change the perioperative morbidity or mortality. Additional research should define optimum strategies for continuation or discontinuation of preoperative cardiovascular medications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30916006
pii: S0007-0912(19)30057-1
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.018
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cardiovascular Agents 0

Types de publication

Consensus Development Conference Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

552-562

Investigateurs

Timothy E Miller (TE)
Monty G Mythen (MG)
Michael Pw Grocott (MP)
Mark R Edwards (MR)
Gareth L Ackland (GL)
Charles S Brudney (CS)
Maurizio Cecconi (M)
Can Ince (C)
Michael G Irwin (MG)
Jonathan Lacey (J)
Michael R Pinsky (MR)
Robert Sanders (R)
Finton Hughes (F)
Angela Bader (A)
Annemarie Thompson (A)
Andreas Hoeft (A)
David Williams (D)
Andrew D Shaw (AD)
Daniel I Sessler (DI)
Sol Aronson (S)
Colin Berry (C)
Tong J Gan (TJ)
John Kellum (J)
James Plumb (J)
Joshua Bloomstone (J)
Matthew D McEvoy (MD)
Julie K M Thacker (JKM)
Ruchir Gupta (R)
Elena Koepke (E)
Aarne Feldheiser (A)
Denny Levett (D)
Frederic Michard (F)
Mark Hamilton (M)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Robert D Sanders (RD)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: robert.sanders@wisc.edu.

Fintan Hughes (F)

University College London/University College London Hospital National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.

Andrew Shaw (A)

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Annemarie Thompson (A)

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Angela Bader (A)

Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Andreas Hoeft (A)

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

David A Williams (DA)

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Michael P W Grocott (MPW)

Acute, Critical and Perioperative Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, University College London, London, UK.

Monty G Mythen (MG)

University College London/University College London Hospital National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, University College London, London, UK.

Timothy E Miller (TE)

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Mark R Edwards (MR)

Acute, Critical and Perioperative Care Research Area, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; Anaesthesia and Critical Care Research Unit, Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH