Feasibility and Acceptability of an Intervention Providing Computer-Generated Tailored Feedback to Target Alcohol Consumption and Depressive Symptoms in Proactively Recruited Health Care Patients and Reactively Recruited Media Volunteers: Results of a Pilot Study.


Journal

European addiction research
ISSN: 1421-9891
Titre abrégé: Eur Addict Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502920

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 06 09 2018
accepted: 15 02 2019
pubmed: 28 3 2019
medline: 17 8 2019
entrez: 28 3 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A pre-post pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of a fully automatized computer-based intervention targeting hazardous drinking and depressiveness in proactively recruited health care patients (HCPs). To address the importance of the sample selection when testing interventions, HCPs were compared to media recruited volunteers (MVs). In a multicenter screening program 2,773 HCPs were screened for hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms. MVs were recruited via media solicitation. Over a period of 6 months, study participants received 6 individualized counseling letters and weekly short messages. Pre-post data were analyzed for 30 participants (15 HCPs, 15 MVs). Intervention acceptability was assessed in post-intervention interviews conducted with 32 study participants. MVs showed higher problem severity and motivation to change than HCPs. Over the course of the intervention both subsamples reduced regular binge drinking (HCPs: p = 0.016; MVs: p = 0.031) and depressiveness (HCPs: p = 0.020; MVs: p < 0.001). MVs further reduced average daily alcohol consumption (p = 0.034). The intervention received positive ratings from both subsamples, the alcohol module was rated more favorably by MVs than by HCPs (p = 0.012). Subsamples further differed in terms of intervention usage (p = 0.013). The intervention was technically and logistically feasible, well accepted, and may have the potential to reduce hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms in different populations. Subsamples differed in terms of problem severity, motivation to change, intervention usage, pre-post changes, and attitudes toward the intervention, showing that intervention development should involve the intended target populations to avoid biased conclusions on intervention effectiveness and acceptability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
A pre-post pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of a fully automatized computer-based intervention targeting hazardous drinking and depressiveness in proactively recruited health care patients (HCPs). To address the importance of the sample selection when testing interventions, HCPs were compared to media recruited volunteers (MVs).
METHOD METHODS
In a multicenter screening program 2,773 HCPs were screened for hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms. MVs were recruited via media solicitation. Over a period of 6 months, study participants received 6 individualized counseling letters and weekly short messages. Pre-post data were analyzed for 30 participants (15 HCPs, 15 MVs). Intervention acceptability was assessed in post-intervention interviews conducted with 32 study participants.
RESULTS RESULTS
MVs showed higher problem severity and motivation to change than HCPs. Over the course of the intervention both subsamples reduced regular binge drinking (HCPs: p = 0.016; MVs: p = 0.031) and depressiveness (HCPs: p = 0.020; MVs: p < 0.001). MVs further reduced average daily alcohol consumption (p = 0.034). The intervention received positive ratings from both subsamples, the alcohol module was rated more favorably by MVs than by HCPs (p = 0.012). Subsamples further differed in terms of intervention usage (p = 0.013).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The intervention was technically and logistically feasible, well accepted, and may have the potential to reduce hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms in different populations. Subsamples differed in terms of problem severity, motivation to change, intervention usage, pre-post changes, and attitudes toward the intervention, showing that intervention development should involve the intended target populations to avoid biased conclusions on intervention effectiveness and acceptability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30917380
pii: 000499040
doi: 10.1159/000499040
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

119-131

Informations de copyright

© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Auteurs

Kristian Krause (K)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, kristian.krause@uni-greifswald.de.

Diana Guertler (D)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Anne Moehring (A)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Anil Batra (A)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Sandra Eck (S)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Hans-Jürgen Rumpf (HJ)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Research Group S:TEP, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Gallus Bischof (G)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Research Group S:TEP, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Michael Lucht (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, HELIOS Hanse-Hospital Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany.

Jennis Freyer-Adam (J)

DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Sabina Ulbricht (S)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Ulrich John (U)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Christian Meyer (C)

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH