Transitional safety incidents as reported by patients and healthcare professionals in the Netherlands: A descriptive study.
Communication
Focus Groups
General Practice
/ statistics & numerical data
General Practitioners
/ statistics & numerical data
Hospitals
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Medical Errors
/ statistics & numerical data
Netherlands
Patient Safety
/ statistics & numerical data
Patient Transfer
/ standards
Risk Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Continuity of care
medical record
primary care
transitional care
transitional safety incidents
Journal
The European journal of general practice
ISSN: 1751-1402
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gen Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9513566
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
30
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Care transitions between general practice and hospital are hazardous regarding patient safety. For developing an improvement strategy adjusted to local settings, understanding of type and potential causes of transitional safety incidents (TSIs) is needed. To provide a broad overview of the nature of TSIs reported by patients and healthcare professionals. We collected data (2011-2015) from three hospitals and 56 affiliated general practitioners (GPs) in two Dutch regions (one urban, one rural). We collected data from patients through a survey, interviews and incident reporting weeks, and from GPs and hospital specialists through incident reporting systems, surveys, interviews and focus group discussions. We classified reported TSIs according to type, cause and severity. In total, 548 TSIs were reported by 411 patients and 137 healthcare professionals; 368 of 548 TSI reports contained sufficient information for classification into aspects of the care transition process, 191 of 548 for cause, and 149 of 548 for severity. Most TSIs concerned handover correspondence from hospital to GP (26%), referral (14%) and communication/collaboration (14%). Concerning cause, reported TSIs could be attributed to organizational (48%) and human factors (43%). Twenty-four percent concerned unsafe situations, 45% near misses and 31% adverse events. Patients and healthcare professionals reported differently on referral (17% vs 9%), repeated diagnostic testing (20% vs 1%), and uncertainty about assigned responsible physician (10% vs 3%). Reported TSIs typically concerned informational discontinuity. One third caused harm to the patient. Patients report different TSIs than healthcare professionals, suggesting a different view.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Care transitions between general practice and hospital are hazardous regarding patient safety. For developing an improvement strategy adjusted to local settings, understanding of type and potential causes of transitional safety incidents (TSIs) is needed.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To provide a broad overview of the nature of TSIs reported by patients and healthcare professionals.
METHODS
METHODS
We collected data (2011-2015) from three hospitals and 56 affiliated general practitioners (GPs) in two Dutch regions (one urban, one rural). We collected data from patients through a survey, interviews and incident reporting weeks, and from GPs and hospital specialists through incident reporting systems, surveys, interviews and focus group discussions. We classified reported TSIs according to type, cause and severity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 548 TSIs were reported by 411 patients and 137 healthcare professionals; 368 of 548 TSI reports contained sufficient information for classification into aspects of the care transition process, 191 of 548 for cause, and 149 of 548 for severity. Most TSIs concerned handover correspondence from hospital to GP (26%), referral (14%) and communication/collaboration (14%). Concerning cause, reported TSIs could be attributed to organizational (48%) and human factors (43%). Twenty-four percent concerned unsafe situations, 45% near misses and 31% adverse events. Patients and healthcare professionals reported differently on referral (17% vs 9%), repeated diagnostic testing (20% vs 1%), and uncertainty about assigned responsible physician (10% vs 3%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Reported TSIs typically concerned informational discontinuity. One third caused harm to the patient. Patients report different TSIs than healthcare professionals, suggesting a different view.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30924697
doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1543396
pmc: PMC6493279
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
77-84Références
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70
pubmed: 10720363
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):161-7
pubmed: 12558354
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 5;141(7):533-6
pubmed: 15466770
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):830-6
pubmed: 16117751
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):510-5
pubmed: 16129874
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41
pubmed: 17327525
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e5
pubmed: 20142403
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):56-65
pubmed: 21220662
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Mar;61(584):183-7
pubmed: 21375902
J Patient Saf. 2010 Dec;6(4):247-50
pubmed: 21500613
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):39-48
pubmed: 22146566
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 26;172(6):517-9
pubmed: 22450942
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i76-83
pubmed: 23112289
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):90-8
pubmed: 23132202
Scand J Public Health. 2013 Dec;41(8):874-82
pubmed: 23960155
Eur J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;19(3):185-93
pubmed: 24024487
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):26-33
pubmed: 24257162
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Dec;65(641):e829-37
pubmed: 26622036
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 19;6(8):e011368
pubmed: 27543588
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:40-49
pubmed: 30121378