A qualitative study of the dissemination and diffusion of innovations: bottom up experiences of senior managers in three health districts in South Africa.
Bottom up
Communication
Diffusion
Dissemination
District manager
Health system
Innovation
Policy analysis
Journal
International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2019
29 03 2019
Historique:
received:
29
11
2018
accepted:
14
03
2019
entrez:
31
3
2019
pubmed:
31
3
2019
medline:
25
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In 2012 the South African National Department of Health (SA NDoH) set out, using a top down process, to implement several innovations in eleven health districts in order to test reforms to strengthen the district health system. The process of disseminating innovations began in 2012 and senior health managers in districts were expected to drive implementation. The research explored, from a bottom up perspective, how efforts by the National government to disseminate and diffuse innovations were experienced by district level senior managers and why some dissemination efforts were more enabling than others. A multiple case study design comprising three cases was conducted. Data collection in 2012 - early 2014 included 38 interviews with provincial and district level managers as well as non- participant observation of meetings. The Greenhalgh et al. (Milbank Q 82(4):581-629, 2004) diffusion of innovations model was used to interpret dissemination and diffusion in the districts. Managers valued the national Minister of Health's role as a champion in disseminating innovations via a road show and his personal participation in an induction programme for new hospital managers. The identification of a site coordinator in each pilot site was valued as this coordinator served as a central point of connection between networks up the hierarchy and horizontally in the district. Managers leveraged their own existing social networks in the districts and created synergies between new ideas and existing working practices to enable adoption by their staff. Managers also wanted to be part of processes that decide what should be strengthened in their districts and want clarity on: (1) the benefits of new innovations (2) total funding they will receive (3) their specific role in implementation and (4) the range of stakeholders involved. Those driving reform processes from 'the top' must remember to develop well planned dissemination strategies that give lower-level managers relevant information and, as part of those strategies, provide ongoing opportunities for bottom up input into key decisions and processes. Managers in districts must be recognised as leaders of change, not only as implementers who are at the receiving end of dissemination strategies from those at the top. They are integral intermediaries between those at the at the coal face and national policies, managing long chains of dissemination and natural (often unpredictable) diffusion.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In 2012 the South African National Department of Health (SA NDoH) set out, using a top down process, to implement several innovations in eleven health districts in order to test reforms to strengthen the district health system. The process of disseminating innovations began in 2012 and senior health managers in districts were expected to drive implementation. The research explored, from a bottom up perspective, how efforts by the National government to disseminate and diffuse innovations were experienced by district level senior managers and why some dissemination efforts were more enabling than others.
METHODS
A multiple case study design comprising three cases was conducted. Data collection in 2012 - early 2014 included 38 interviews with provincial and district level managers as well as non- participant observation of meetings. The Greenhalgh et al. (Milbank Q 82(4):581-629, 2004) diffusion of innovations model was used to interpret dissemination and diffusion in the districts.
RESULTS
Managers valued the national Minister of Health's role as a champion in disseminating innovations via a road show and his personal participation in an induction programme for new hospital managers. The identification of a site coordinator in each pilot site was valued as this coordinator served as a central point of connection between networks up the hierarchy and horizontally in the district. Managers leveraged their own existing social networks in the districts and created synergies between new ideas and existing working practices to enable adoption by their staff. Managers also wanted to be part of processes that decide what should be strengthened in their districts and want clarity on: (1) the benefits of new innovations (2) total funding they will receive (3) their specific role in implementation and (4) the range of stakeholders involved.
CONCLUSION
Those driving reform processes from 'the top' must remember to develop well planned dissemination strategies that give lower-level managers relevant information and, as part of those strategies, provide ongoing opportunities for bottom up input into key decisions and processes. Managers in districts must be recognised as leaders of change, not only as implementers who are at the receiving end of dissemination strategies from those at the top. They are integral intermediaries between those at the at the coal face and national policies, managing long chains of dissemination and natural (often unpredictable) diffusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30925878
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0952-z
pii: 10.1186/s12939-019-0952-z
pmc: PMC6441208
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
53Références
Health Policy. 2014 Feb;114(2-3):269-77
pubmed: 24326300
Reprod Health Matters. 2003 May;11(21):108-19
pubmed: 12800708
Lancet. 2016 Feb 20;387(10020):811-6
pubmed: 26299185
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Dec;16 Suppl 2:44-51
pubmed: 11772989
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 02;10 Suppl 1:S7
pubmed: 20594373
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 29;14:609
pubmed: 25432243
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 02;10 Suppl 1:S4
pubmed: 20594370
Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):933-43
pubmed: 22959390
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 3:iii35-50
pubmed: 25435535
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2:ii1-5
pubmed: 25274634
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Sep;59(6):1251-61
pubmed: 15210096
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Nov 1;89(11):831-7
pubmed: 22084529
S Afr Med J. 2013 Jan 23;103(3):156-8
pubmed: 23472691
Health Policy Plan. 1994 Dec;9(4):353-70
pubmed: 10139469
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Sep;24(5):342-56
pubmed: 19561012
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1200-11
pubmed: 27233927
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jun 16;12:30
pubmed: 24935658
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):294-307
pubmed: 18650209
BMJ. 2001 Sep 29;323(7315):746-9
pubmed: 11576986
Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2164-71
pubmed: 24793339
Health Promot Int. 2005 Jun;20(2):187-93
pubmed: 15722364
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Jul 06;11:23
pubmed: 23829555
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944