Development and validation of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Damage Index (SCTC-DI): a novel instrument to quantify organ damage in systemic sclerosis.
organ damage
outcome measure
systemic sclerosis
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
14
11
2018
revised:
11
03
2019
accepted:
12
03
2019
pubmed:
1
4
2019
medline:
30
1
2020
entrez:
1
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to develop the first Damage Index (DI) in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The conceptual definition of 'damage' in SSc was determined through consensus by a working group of the Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC). Systematic literature review and consultation with patient partners and non-rheumatologist experts produced a list of potential items for inclusion in the DI. These steps were used to reduce the items: (1) Expert members of the SCTC (n=331) were invited to rate the appropriateness of each item for inclusion, using a web-based survey. Items with >60% consensus were retained; (2) Using a prospectively acquired Australian cohort data set of 1568 patients, the univariable relationships between the remaining items and the endpoints of mortality and morbidity (Physical Component Summary score of the Short Form 36) were analysed, and items with p<0.10 were retained; (3) using multivariable regression analysis, coefficients were used to determine a weighted score for each item. The DI was externally validated in a Canadian cohort. Ninety-three (28.1%) complete survey responses were analysed; 58 of 83 items were retained. The univariable relationships with death and/or morbidity endpoints were statistically significant for 22 items, with one additional item forced into the multivariable model by experts due to clinical importance, to create a 23-item weighted SCTC DI (SCTC-DI). The SCTC-DI was predictive of morbidity and mortality in the external cohort. Through the combined use of consensus and data-driven methods, a 23-item SCTC-DI was developed and retrospectively validated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30928903
pii: annrheumdis-2018-214764
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214764
doi:
Types de publication
Consensus Development Conference
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
807-816Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FRN 83518
Pays : Canada
Investigateurs
Mandana Nikpour
(M)
Nava Ferdowsi MurrayBaron
(NF)
Tracy Frech
(T)
Marie Hudson
(M)
Susanna Proudman
(S)
Tien Tay WendyStevens
(TT)
Lorinda Chung
(L)
Jessica K Gordon
(JK)
Anna Haemel
(A)
Sindhu RJohnson
(S)
Dinesh Khanna
(D)
Thomas A Medsger
(TA)
John Pauling
(J)
Janet E Pope
(JE)
Lesley Saketkoo TatianaRodriguez-Reyna
(LS)
James R Seibold
(JR)
Ankoor Shah
(A)
Virginia Steen
(V)
Gemma Strickland
(G)
Catherine Hill
(C)
Mandana Nikpour Gene-SiewNgian
(MN)
Susanna Proudman
(S)
Maureen Rischmueller
(M)
Janet Roddy
(J)
Wendy Stevens JoanneSahhar
(WS)
Gemma Strickland
(G)
Jenny Walker
(J)
Peter Youssef
(P)
J Pope
(J)
M Baron
(M)
D Robinson
(D)
N Jones
(N)
N Khalidi
(N)
P Docherty
(P)
E Kaminska
(E)
E Sutton
(E)
J-P Mathieu
(JP)
M Hudson
(M)
S Ligier
(S)
T Grodzicky
(T)
C Thorne
(C)
G Gyger
(G)
D Smith
(D)
P R Fortin
(PR)
M Larché
(M)
M Abu-Hakima
(M)
T S Rodriguez-Reyna
(TS)
A R Cabral
(AR)
M Fritzler
(M)
Peter Merkel
(P)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.