Seroprevalence of bovine Anaplasmosis in Georgia.


Journal

Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports
ISSN: 2405-9390
Titre abrégé: Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101680410

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 01 09 2018
revised: 19 12 2018
accepted: 19 12 2018
entrez: 2 4 2019
pubmed: 2 4 2019
medline: 19 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Anecdotally, Veterinary Feed Directive prescriptions in many states in the southeastern United States (U.S.) are written most often for treatment and prevention of bovine anaplasmosis (BA). This tick-borne disease of cattle caused by Anaplasma marginale remains an economically important disease in U.S. However, there are no prevalence estimates of this disease in Georgia (GA). Thus, this study was aimed at determining the seroprevalence of BA in GA. In an active cull beef cow screening for BA, 293 beef cows were sampled from one cattle auction barn and one slaughterhouse between May 2013 and September 2014. These cows originated from 6 of 159 counties in GA. The top 3 counties sampled were Gordon (241 samples), Carroll (25 samples), and Emanuel (12 samples). Of the 293 sampled beef cows, 13 were positive and 280 were negative for BA. Hence, with competitive ELISA, the overall observed apparent seroprevalence of BA in GA was 4.44% (95% CI: 2.61-7.44%) while the estimated true seroprevalence was 2.62% (95% CI: 5.2-5.87%). The top 2 prevalent counties were Carroll and Gordon with apparent seroprevalence of 8% (95% CI: 2.22-24.97) and 4.78% (95% CI: 2.69-8.36), respectively and estimated true seroprevalence of 6.45% (95% CI: 0-25.37) and 2.99% (95% CI: 0.54-6.89), respectively. Although not significant, counties with specimen submissions for BA testing had a greater cattle population and number of cattle farms than counties without specimen submissions. Nevertheless, future prevention and control measures for BA should out of caution target counties with ≥5000 total cattle heads.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30929935
pii: S2405-9390(18)30203-X
doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.100258
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Bacterial 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100258

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Chika C Okafor (CC)

Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, United States. Electronic address: okaforch@utk.edu.

Samantha L Collins (SL)

Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN, United States.

Joseph A Daniel (JA)

Department of Animal Science, Berry College, Mt. Berry, GA, United States.

Johann F Coetzee (JF)

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Brian K Whitlock (BK)

Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH