The Endocranial Bifrontal Angle: A Longitudinal Evaluation in Two Patients With Metopic Synostosis.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
3
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metopic craniosynostosis is the early fusion of the skull bones in the frontal region of the metopic suture, which leads to trigonocephaly and neurological sequelae. Severe metopic craniosynostosis is defined by an endocranial bifrontal angle less than 124°, and this serves as a threshold for neurological deficit and significant skull deformity, typically warranting surgical treatment. Two patients presented for evaluation for metopic craniosynostosis. Low-dose computed tomography imaging was performed in both patients due to concern for underlying metopic craniosynostosis. In both patients, imaging demonstrated an initial endocranial bifrontal angle greater than 124°. However, in subsequent evaluation, the children developed severe trigonocephaly, and an angle less than 124°. The authors present 2 patients with metopic craniosynostosis, which became severe over time. The authors hypothesize that this may be due to an initial smaller head circumference, which later experienced rapid growth, leading to narrower endocranial bifrontal angle. Therefore, younger children with suspected metopic craniosynostosis, with initially smaller head circumference (but not meeting the threshold of 124°) should be followed longitudinally, as the head circumference may demonstrate greater narrowing subsequently into a more severe form of trigonocephaly and possibly surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Metopic craniosynostosis is the early fusion of the skull bones in the frontal region of the metopic suture, which leads to trigonocephaly and neurological sequelae. Severe metopic craniosynostosis is defined by an endocranial bifrontal angle less than 124°, and this serves as a threshold for neurological deficit and significant skull deformity, typically warranting surgical treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
Two patients presented for evaluation for metopic craniosynostosis. Low-dose computed tomography imaging was performed in both patients due to concern for underlying metopic craniosynostosis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In both patients, imaging demonstrated an initial endocranial bifrontal angle greater than 124°. However, in subsequent evaluation, the children developed severe trigonocephaly, and an angle less than 124°.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The authors present 2 patients with metopic craniosynostosis, which became severe over time. The authors hypothesize that this may be due to an initial smaller head circumference, which later experienced rapid growth, leading to narrower endocranial bifrontal angle. Therefore, younger children with suspected metopic craniosynostosis, with initially smaller head circumference (but not meeting the threshold of 124°) should be followed longitudinally, as the head circumference may demonstrate greater narrowing subsequently into a more severe form of trigonocephaly and possibly surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30939543
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005358
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng